Welcome Guest

By your rationale if Trump has a meeting

Posted on: July 25, 2019 at 08:12:24 CT

tman MU

Posts:

36287

Member For:

21.74 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

With his advisors, let's say WH counsel, and says in the meeting, or asks if he can (which he had the right to do) I want to fire Rosenstein, that is enough for obstruction.

This isn't enough to meet the standard

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

You all seem ok with Trump clearly obbstructing justice,why? - TexJohnson MU - 7/25 08:04:13

It's not even remotely clear. What are you smoking?(nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 7/25 09:01:23

Give me one example that relates to a reality that isn't - GA Tiger MU - 7/25 08:46:19

Suppose you had testimony in an investigation - Mormad MU - 7/25 09:36:29

Why do you believe Trump needed help to fire Mueller? If he - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/25 08:38:05

What specifically did Trump do that’s classified... - JayRoy KC - 7/25 08:32:59

There it is, Folks!...One DOC handle having a conversation - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/25 08:36:04

You’re way off there Sherlock. Weak. - JayRoy KC - 7/25 09:02:18

why do you keep switching handles DOC?(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU

- 7/25 08:26:52

He uses one dumfuk handle to distract from another... - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/25 08:33:03

Well, Tex...It's like when you get one of them dotheads... - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/25 08:24:43

Lol(nm) - TheWildcat STL - 7/25 08:18:08

Nobody has said they're "ok" with that - MIZ45 MU - 7/25 08:15:47

By your rationale if Trump has a meeting - tman MU - 7/25 08:12:24

This isn't a hypothetical, he asked McGahn directly and - TexJohnson MU - 7/25 08:16:12

requires a corrupt intent. which was not present. - blake1771 KC - 7/25 09:24:39

He did not need either of them. If he wanted him fired he - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/25 08:42:04

A person who is accused unfairly should be pi$$ed off. - None**** MU - 7/25 08:23:28

And that isn't obstruction. What don't you get - tman MU - 7/25 08:18:40

which element? - Ace AU - 7/25 08:22:45

Your case falls apart in the second sentence. Obstruction - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/25 08:46:29

and furthermore requires a corrupt intent. - blake1771 KC - 7/25 09:25:57

RE: Your case falls apart in the second sentence. Obstruction - Ace AU - 7/25 09:20:12

Intent. He has the right to fire the FBI director for examp - tman MU - 7/25 08:27:27

RE: Intent. He has the right to fire the FBI director for examp - Ace AU - 7/25 08:32:20

You still aren't there. You are still confusing conversatio - tman MU - 7/25 08:44:50

False premise much? Try posting something factual - None**** MU - 7/25 08:11:09

Even Mueller didn't claim Trump clearly obstructed justice - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:09:31

RE: Even Mueller didn't claim Trump clearly obstructed justice - Ace AU - 7/25 08:10:21

Gee----"may have" not" clearly" - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:12:25

RE: Gee----"may have" not" clearly" - Ace AU - 7/25 08:16:14

You are making up the part about being indicted later - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/25 08:06:40

RE: You are making up the part about being indicted later - Ace AU - 7/25 08:08:46

Did you forget to switch handles DOC?(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU

- 7/25 08:29:20

I am using Mueller’s testimony and clarification - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/25 08:13:20

Dershowitz is 100Xs you intellectually - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:11:03

RE: Dershowitz is 100Xs you intellectually - Ace AU - 7/25 08:17:06

Factual statement---you are not close to Dershowitz - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:49:51

He didn't clearly obstruct justice. You're ignorance isn't - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/25 08:05:25