Welcome Guest

Heupel and Ellarbee will be missed. Both were outstanding

Posted on: July 5, 2018 at 22:16:38 CT

Fourth and Long MU

Posts:

14733

Member For:

12.64 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

coaches and were replaced by misfits. Time will tell but our recent track record includes flops like Cross, Ricker and Shipp.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Rock M article on Dooley - mattieo86 MU - 7/5 16:25:19

Most important question: will he use a fullback? - jake_mu MU - 7/7 09:10:35

It will be interesting to see how he does. While I'd love - GeorgiaTiger76 MU - 7/5 16:52:14

RE: It will be interesting to see how he does. While I'd love - Ragarm MU - 7/6 06:38:26

Heupel and Ellarbee will be missed. Both were outstanding - Fourth and Long MU - 7/5 22:16:38

Heupel was worthless unless you were a D2 school. - jake_mu MU - 7/7 09:09:28

Heupel was a goof ball who ran a dumb offense. (nm) - Uncle John MU

- 7/6 10:05:29

Heupel was the best OC we've had in decades. - alwaysright MU - 7/6 13:23:28

DADGUM RIGHT!!1 STINKEL'S OFFENSES WERE AWFUL!!!!1 - Mothball MU - 7/6 14:59:10

fuk, you're an idiot. - alwaysright MU - 7/8 18:30:16

He was great for Lock - tigersailor MU - 7/6 13:36:18

Seriously? (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 7/6 11:13:08

How are Dooley and Davis misfits?(nm) - Diamond Dave MU

- 7/6 07:23:50

It also includes hit like - wu-tangtiger MU - 7/5 22:28:39

True, It's been a mixed-bag (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 7/5 22:33:32

Dooley is more of an offensive Head Coach - BOILERTIGER MU

- 7/5 18:00:16

DD has been involved in a lot of good offenses. - wu-tangtiger MU - 7/5 17:15:53

I generally consider DD to be good talent. - alwaysright MU - 7/5 17:18:51

As an example to what I said below... - alwaysright MU - 7/5 17:10:59

I could care less about YPG - nitwittc3 MU - 7/5 16:44:53

Depends how you get those yards - SuperTone MU

- 7/6 06:57:45

Agreed, yards per play is more important. better on - alwaysright MU - 7/5 17:06:09

We were ranked the 3rd worst in TOP - nitwittc3 MU - 7/6 10:17:55

That's a key factor in a lot of these folks saying - alwaysright MU - 7/8 18:37:59

I'm one who believes time of possession is irrelevant. - zodiac6 JC - 7/5 17:35:51

Low time of possession makes your defense worse, no - alwaysright MU - 7/6 07:40:59

I think it is relevant to your D especially - MoGold MU - 7/5 18:01:56

Time of possession measures the game clock. - zodiac6 JC - 7/5 18:39:25

Only if your goal is the same. I believe that if you have a - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 7/6 07:45:39

You missed the point. It is time on the field that wears - SuperTone MU

- 7/6 06:58:59

Yeah, TOP is going by the wayside in the modern game - Diamond Dave MU

- 7/5 17:46:23

It made a lot of sense when most teams ran run-heavy - zodiac6 JC - 7/5 17:52:10

Because it matters more than most want to admit. The - alwaysright MU - 7/8 19:00:25

ToP is an overrated stat - wu-tangtiger MU - 7/5 17:20:02

I didn't say ToP was the cause, it is the result. But it - alwaysright MU - 7/6 07:42:52

A lot of the ToP issues the last couple of seasons are - wu-tangtiger MU - 7/6 08:25:40

if you looked at number of possessions, I bet it is even - Gamagrass MU - 7/6 12:38:16

Right. ToP is an indicator. It's not a cause and it's not - alwaysright MU - 7/6 13:21:05