Welcome Guest

You're wrong again... and again... and again.

Posted on: December 18, 2017 at 10:24:17 CT
Alferd Packer MU
Posts:
50313
Member For:
25.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It's in the Constitution.
We went over this last summer and I proved you're wrong.

Here is how immigration is included in the Constitution:

Congress has the power to define and punish...Offenses against the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations includes the right of nations to forbid the entrance of foreigners or particular people for any reason.


Article I Section 8 Clause 9:
The Congress shall have Power...To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

Law of Nations: Book II, Chapter VII, Paragraph 94
The sovereign may forbid the entrance of his territory either to foreigners in general or in particular cases, or to certain persons or for certain particular purposes, according as he may think it advantageous to the state. There is nothing in all this that does not flow from the rights of domain and sovereignty: every one is obliged to pay respect to the prohibition; and whoever dares to violate it, incurs the penalty decreed to render it effectual. But the prohibition ought to be known, as well as the penalty annexed to disobedience: those who are ignorant of it, ought to be informed of it when they approach to enter the country. Formerly the Chinese, fearing lest the intercourse of strangers should corrupt the manners of the nation, and impair the maxims of a wise but singular government, forbade all people entering the empire: a prohibition that was not at all inconsistent with justice, provided they did not refuse human assistance to those whom tempest or necessity obliged to approach their frontiers. It was salutary to the nation, without violating the rights of any individual, or even the duties of humanity, which permits us, in case of competition, to prefer ourselves to others.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/333368-the-constitution-does-indeed-permit-immigration-caps-as-the

https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html

http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14958831
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Legislating from the field is how we got a - JG MU - 12/18 10:08:31
          Agree. The "in the vicinity" rule at 2nd base is a - hokie VT - 12/18 10:10:21
     SCOTUS should enforce the law as written - ummmm MU - 12/18 09:57:57
          I agree but there are times when the law is - hokie VT - 12/18 10:09:21
               That's great and all, but I'd rather SCOTUS just follow - ummmm MU - 12/18 10:54:46
               It would take an amendment to change or clarify the 14th. - Alferd Packer MU - 12/18 10:16:36
                    A constitutional convention would be a disaster. Imagine - hokie VT - 12/18 10:51:19
               The Constitution doesn't say that - pickle MU - 12/18 10:11:15
                    You're wrong again... and again... and again. - Alferd Packer MU - 12/18 10:24:17
                         Sorry, but that's not true - pickle MU - 12/18 10:32:05
                              The Constitution says Congress does have the authority. - Alferd Packer MU - 12/18 10:36:07
                                   Um, you're arguing with the pickle. Why...? nm - hokie VT - 12/18 10:52:49
          The Founder's intent of the SC was what then?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/18 10:08:41
               Article III (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/18 10:53:11
                    Looks like a lot of interpretation there. Not - GA Tiger MU - 12/18 12:08:53
               Read the Constitution, GAT - pickle MU - 12/18 10:09:28
     One thing they should do is fire the clown who decided that. - GA Tiger MU - 12/18 09:57:39
     They should enforce as it's written. - tcat UMKC - 12/18 09:57:02
          But they didn't do that. It is indeterminable that - GA Tiger MU - 12/18 09:59:35
               The one on the field or the final call?(nm) - tcat UMKC - 12/18 10:01:48
                    One on the field. Refs got one right. Guy in the booth - GA Tiger MU - 12/18 10:07:25
                         Maybe, I always believe the fix is in when it comes to the - tcat UMKC - 12/18 10:09:58
     Wrong board - pickle MU - 12/18 09:54:22
     what does this have to do with kneeling during the anthem or - SwampTiger MU - 12/18 09:54:17
     TOUCHDOWN. - raskolnikov MU - 12/18 09:53:22
          What if in a different game on the same day, a different ref - hokie VT - 12/18 10:02:43
               The struggles of a feeble mind (nm) - pickle MU - 12/18 10:08:37
          So they can ignore the rules and "interpret" them as they - hokie VT - 12/18 09:57:10
          His knee was down before the ball crossed the plane. (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/18 09:54:54
               Then it has nothing to do with the catch - raskolnikov MU - 12/18 09:56:15




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard