Welcome Guest

did you know how the bush appointee would vote?

Posted on: February 9, 2017 at 21:00:42 CT

tigerdb MU

Posts:

58182

Member For:

24.36 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

actually 2/4 judges that opined were bush appointees...the original ruling judge and one of the 3 appeals justices (that unanimous decision.)

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

9th Circuit has reversal rate of 80%... - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:36:41

No they don't - why do you persist with these lies? - tigerdb MU - 2/9 20:58:33

RE: No they don't - why do you persist with these lies? - MUTGR MU - 2/9 21:02:03

Since SCOTUS has been right-wing for nearly 50 years - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/9 22:25:12

Just shows how non-sensical it is to entrust such important - ummmm MU - 2/9 20:43:20

Not non-sensical at all. To whom WOULD you trust that? - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:51:55

I would never have centralized authorities make decisions - ummmm MU - 2/9 20:58:20

It is an issue that must be answered.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 21:00:29

That's the problem. - ummmm MU - 2/9 21:05:04

good thing you're not on the court - pickle MU

- 2/9 21:02:48

GAT needs rulers (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/9 20:59:53

Indeed. I think changes are in the works on that ...perhaps - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:49:46

Because of all their nutjob, inane Libtard decisions(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:40:47

RE: Because of all their nutjob, inane Libtard decisions(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:42:11

Have to run for a bit, but as an abbreviated response.... - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:47:28

How is it wrong? Because to be right the constitution - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:45:58

for it to be right, no restrictions on immigration would be - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:11:36

between you and i, one of us ranked in the top 5 - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:57:46

Which is irrelevant to the issue here. But don't - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:59:32

GAT, the Constitution applies to the federal gvmt - pickle MU

- 2/9 21:02:16

Omg, this is such a bunch of unintelligient bullsh*t, it's - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 21:12:34

once they are here yes. but not before they are here. - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:12:28

even before they are here (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/9 21:13:15

Nope, not reality & only the Bill of Rights arguably applies - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 21:21:39

in your world yes. not according to the laws of the US. - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:17:35

not in my world, but according to the Constitution - pickle MU

- 2/9 21:23:38

^^Lol, biggest Buffoon Clown on the Internet bar none!!!!... - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 22:45:23

please cite the exact clause to which you refer - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:26:48

i couldn't care less what a court says - pickle MU

- 2/9 21:42:09

Lol, more utterings from a completely uneducated moron!!(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 22:46:51

GAT, you really need to drop this argument - pickle MU

- 2/9 20:57:19

Its completely logical.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 21:02:22

it isn't - pickle MU

- 2/9 21:14:00

It's time to stop posting. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 2/9 20:54:09

He has to let up....or he wouldn't get them to come on. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 2/9 20:39:01

Sorry wrong thread.(nm) - Logan BAMA - 2/9 20:39:46

when I saw the pic of the woman judge, I knew how'd she - tigerNkc KC - 2/9 20:38:25

And you knew this how? - mizzoumurfkc MU

- 2/9 21:47:49

did you know how the bush appointee would vote? - tigerdb MU - 2/9 21:00:42

And that has what to do with what exactly? nm. - MUTGR MU - 2/9 21:03:00

Of course. A bimbo from calif.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:50:52

it was unanimous.(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:42:33

how is it wrong here?(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:37:23

For starters, its opinion didn't mention the relevant - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:43:39

interestingly, ctl f does not reveal a hit for 1182 - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:55:28

RE: interestingly, ctl f does not reveal a hit for 1182 - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:59:13

then you know the 1182 bit means nothing - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 21:05:54

RE: then you know the 1182 bit means nothing - MUTGR MU - 2/9 21:20:16