Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I would never have centralized authorities make decisions

Posted on: February 9, 2017 at 20:58:20 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.46 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
on such important issues.

So the answer is no one.

These people are obviously not handing down opinions from God if one bunch of bureaucrats is reversed by another bunch of bureaucrats 80% of the time. Are the Supreme bureaucrats that much wiser?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

9th Circuit has reversal rate of 80%... - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:36:41
     No they don't - why do you persist with these lies? - tigerdb MU - 2/9 20:58:33
          RE: No they don't - why do you persist with these lies? - MUTGR MU - 2/9 21:02:03
               Since SCOTUS has been right-wing for nearly 50 years - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/9 22:25:12
     Just shows how non-sensical it is to entrust such important - ummmm MU - 2/9 20:43:20
          Not non-sensical at all. To whom WOULD you trust that? - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:51:55
               I would never have centralized authorities make decisions - ummmm MU - 2/9 20:58:20
                    It is an issue that must be answered.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 21:00:29
                         That's the problem. - ummmm MU - 2/9 21:05:04
                         good thing you're not on the court - pickle MU - 2/9 21:02:48
                    GAT needs rulers (nm) - pickle MU - 2/9 20:59:53
          Indeed. I think changes are in the works on that ...perhaps - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:49:46
     Because of all their nutjob, inane Libtard decisions(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:40:47
          RE: Because of all their nutjob, inane Libtard decisions(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:42:11
               Have to run for a bit, but as an abbreviated response.... - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:47:28
               How is it wrong? Because to be right the constitution - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:45:58
                    for it to be right, no restrictions on immigration would be - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:11:36
                    between you and i, one of us ranked in the top 5 - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:57:46
                         Which is irrelevant to the issue here. But don't - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:59:32
                              GAT, the Constitution applies to the federal gvmt - pickle MU - 2/9 21:02:16
                                   Omg, this is such a bunch of unintelligient bullsh*t, it's - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 21:12:34
                                   once they are here yes. but not before they are here. - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:12:28
                                        even before they are here (nm) - pickle MU - 2/9 21:13:15
                                             Nope, not reality & only the Bill of Rights arguably applies - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 21:21:39
                                             in your world yes. not according to the laws of the US. - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:17:35
                                                  not in my world, but according to the Constitution - pickle MU - 2/9 21:23:38
                                                       ^^Lol, biggest Buffoon Clown on the Internet bar none!!!!... - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 22:45:23
                                                       please cite the exact clause to which you refer - blake1771 KC - 2/9 21:26:48
                                                            i couldn't care less what a court says - pickle MU - 2/9 21:42:09
                                                                 Lol, more utterings from a completely uneducated moron!!(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 22:46:51
                    GAT, you really need to drop this argument - pickle MU - 2/9 20:57:19
                         Its completely logical.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 21:02:22
                              it isn't - pickle MU - 2/9 21:14:00
                    It's time to stop posting. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 2/9 20:54:09
     He has to let up....or he wouldn't get them to come on. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 2/9 20:39:01
          Sorry wrong thread.(nm) - Logan BAMA - 2/9 20:39:46
     when I saw the pic of the woman judge, I knew how'd she - tigerNkc KC - 2/9 20:38:25
          And you knew this how? - mizzoumurfkc MU - 2/9 21:47:49
          did you know how the bush appointee would vote? - tigerdb MU - 2/9 21:00:42
               And that has what to do with what exactly? nm. - MUTGR MU - 2/9 21:03:00
          Of course. A bimbo from calif.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/9 20:50:52
          it was unanimous.(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:42:33
     how is it wrong here?(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:37:23
          For starters, its opinion didn't mention the relevant - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:43:39
               interestingly, ctl f does not reveal a hit for 1182 - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 20:55:28
                    RE: interestingly, ctl f does not reveal a hit for 1182 - MUTGR MU - 2/9 20:59:13
                         then you know the 1182 bit means nothing - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 21:05:54
                              RE: then you know the 1182 bit means nothing - MUTGR MU - 2/9 21:20:16




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard