Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

please explain how Robart supported his

Posted on: February 4, 2017 at 16:28:15 CT

blake1771 MU

Posts:

14452

Member For:

20.02 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

argument that the plaintiffs would be more likely to win on merit than not? please explain how the judge explained how they were harmed?

he didn't. he just said they would be more likely to win on merit and said they would be harmed. said and taken as fact, but not supported. end of story.

Edited by blake1771 at 16:29:32 on 02/04/17

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

very interesting to read the order by Robart, the Seattle - blake1771 KC - 2/4 16:03:58

Piece of crap order by Robart...trying to be hero. nm. - MUTGR MU - 2/4 17:28:36

provide the legal analysis for which it is wrong(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:38:17

RE: provide the legal analysis for which it is wrong(nm) - MUTGR MU - 2/4 17:47:11

Its not religious. But, the current war is. - Coors4bob MU - 2/4 17:47:10

didn't address the 1a issues on the merits - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 16:34:05

Thats the thing with political hacks - JG A - 2/4 16:26:45

please explain how Robart supported his - blake1771 KC - 2/4 16:28:15

i think the crux of the opposing argument - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 16:57:18

And ignores that any predominant religion is irrelevant to - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 17:01:42

it is the duty of the court - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:07:57

Ah, yes, the "the order is legal, but we know what he's - 90Tiger MU - 2/4 17:24:51

be a legal scholar - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:36:25

I think he means lawyer. There are so many want to be - tman KC - 2/4 17:37:47

i am a lawyer and trying to tell you the standard - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:39:30

So am I and you haven't stated the standard. - tman KC - 2/4 17:43:26

k. - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:54:25

The consider the order as written. By the way you consider - tman KC - 2/4 18:11:53

Even if you want to identify the sincere purpose of the orde - 90Tiger MU - 2/4 18:02:24

you will see they don't dispute it, either(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:09:27

The order only give preference to the minority religion - tman KC - 2/4 17:11:34

nonsensical - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:37:42

Try answering. With your Middle Eastern Peace Studies - tman KC - 2/4 17:38:49

when the ban is lifted it absolutely - gmmm98 MU - 2/4 17:41:41

It isn't & hasn't favored any religion, nor is it based on - STL1DFW STL - 2/9 20:44:46

RE: It isn't & hasn't favored any religion, nor is it based on - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 21:00:30

That depends on the country - Sal KC - 2/4 23:22:38

Why do you think that is? Would the religious minority - tman KC - 2/4 17:48:13

Hard to say without a court transcript - JG A - 2/4 16:40:24

well i didn't have a transcript from Gorton's case but you - blake1771 KC - 2/4 16:41:48

I do get that - JG A - 2/4 16:46:04

Yes, how in hell was the state of Washington harmed - tigertix MU - 2/4 16:34:26

Well, they may provide really, really cheap labor. Of course - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 16:36:35

So to summarize - we can take this to illustrate - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 16:24:02

LOL, what? - tigerspy MU - 2/4 16:43:54

The ones out on the street destroying things because - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 16:46:38

You mean the 100 or so people rioting? - Hbombtiger STL - 2/4 17:40:19

What the hell are you talking about? - tigerspy MU - 2/4 16:50:53

For that matter, what does who the left is have - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 16:53:47

This thread is about the two judges decisions. - tigerspy MU - 2/4 16:54:44

YOUR QUESTION YOU ****ING IDIOT.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 16:57:35

LOL TrumpTard. - tigerspy MU - 2/4 16:58:53

WHAT DOES YOU QUESTION HAVE TO DO WITH IT?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/4 17:02:16

One more time, TrumpTard. - tigerspy MU - 2/4 17:05:15

you're going to ruin their dart throwing party (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/4 16:08:07

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard