First:
Posted on: October 27, 2016 at 14:20:39 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67228
Member For:
9.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I was trying to get to the point where you would not sacrifice a living human for study, analysis and spare parts. I chose a retarded infant, not certain you would distinguish it from a fetus 31 days younger.
Second: I appreciate that you believe i personify man.
Third: Your example had an unmarried couple (unmarried to each other) having a pregnancy which would be delivered for slaughter and study. You did not seem a proponent of the marriage thing.
Curious, do you eat meat? Do you approve of the slaughter of animals so their bodies can be eaten by you? YOU, who in your own estimation are no better than they are...
How about fish and poultry?
How about plants, plankton, and other non animal edibles? Do you approve of the slaughter of a stalk of corn being ripped out of the ground, the ears aggressively ripped from the stalk, thrown into bins as if they were....corn, and then cooked and eaten by the likes of....YOU?
Do you wear leather? The hide of an animal no less of a being than yourself?
Where do you draw the line? I'll bet there is a large convenience factor in your thinking, but not in your answer. Assuming an answer is forthcoming.