Welcome Guest

If that is the case that why was Jon allowed to vote in the

Posted on: July 28, 2016 at 10:39:26 CT
doughboy MU
Posts:
29177
Member For:
25.17 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
last BOC meeting?

Using the SCOTUS example - the nominated justice doesn't sit on the bench until confirmed. With the BOC the recess appointee does act as a full member (attending meetings, voting) though they're not confirmed. The only way that example is the same is if, using current example, Merrick Garland could sit on the bench and hear cases as a justice until he's confirmed or the next president makes their selection.

The bylaw is silent as to what constitutes a member outside of "duly appointed and qualified as by law"

We know he was duly appointed but what exactly is qualified by law? Does that mean Senate confirmation or does it mean Jon meets the basic legal requirements - resident of the district he's been appointed to represent and fulfills the political party balance requirement. I don't know what the answer is to that one.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     He would just have to resign from the BOC and - catbirdseat MU - 7/28 09:27:18
     Goods and service provider does not equal employee - doughboy MU - 7/28 08:11:41
          It don't believe lack of confirmation keeps from being duly - MizzouTigerz MU - 7/28 13:43:34
               I think you're right - it was a flimsy attempt - doughboy MU - 7/28 14:15:13
     Sundvold will not be AD. - cooter KC - 7/28 00:37:30
          First off, I didn't say he would be. I said I believe that - MizzouTigerz MU - 7/28 13:55:36
          I find it interesting that his name was not included... - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 07:51:34
     Is Sundvold qualified to be the athletic director? - 615Tiger STL - 7/28 00:10:10
          Dan Devine was our AD in the 60's with zero prior, nm - MU-TULSA MU - 7/28 11:01:02
          If people with no AD experience should be considered, then - jrmtiger MU - 7/28 08:36:10
               University of Alabama disagrees with you. - Uncle John MU - 7/28 09:07:39
                    The same anecdotal sh*t you point out with Bo Ryan relative - jrmtiger MU - 7/28 12:01:52
                         He is a business professional, who also has a lot of - MizzouTigerz MU - 7/28 14:08:47
                         Because an AD is not a "Business" person. He is mainly a - ROLLATIGER MU - 7/28 12:49:47
                    And goodness knows, they don't know how to run... - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 10:27:42
          What about that AB guy? Why is he qualified?(nm) - tigersailor MU - 7/28 08:24:05
               He is not qualified to be an AD. He would come closer to - ROLLATIGER MU - 7/28 12:50:53
          He's more than "an iconic figure". He's a very successful.. - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 07:49:59
          Being qualified for employment in Mizzou Athletics is not a - tigerdb MU - 7/28 06:20:29
               Just as - chokingmychickenhawk MU - 7/28 06:21:50
                    Dumb(nm) - jrmtiger MU - 7/28 08:33:12
                         You can't spell dumb without tigerdb. nm - BandG MU - 7/28 10:30:01
                              You make no more sense than your creepy stalker - tigerdb MU - 7/28 10:49:20
                                   And you are one negative A-hole who is very tiring to read. - BandG MU - 7/29 16:02:08
          That is true but the definition of member of the board does - doughboy MU - 7/28 08:14:38
               I don't think you're a member of the BOC until you've been.. - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 10:29:34
                    If that is the case that why was Jon allowed to vote in the - doughboy MU - 7/28 10:39:26
               Fair enough(nm) - Bobk MU - 7/28 10:25:54




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard