Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Goods and service provider does not equal employee

Posted on: July 28, 2016 at 08:11:41 CT

doughboy MU

Posts:

29253

Member For:

25.77 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

It's two separate prohibitions under one article in the bylaws - one for employment, the other for service provider.

Here's where the argument can be made - I found the official definition of "member of the Board of Curators" - Section 10.030 #3 -

https://www.umsystem.edu/ums/rules/collected_rules/administration/ch10/10.030_board_bylaws

"The term "Board of Curators of the University of Missouri," "Board of Curators," or "Board" shall refer to the governing board of The Curators of the University of Missouri, and shall be composed of the Curators duly appointed and qualified as provided by law."

The argument that can be made is that by not being confirmed by the Senate JS isn't "qualified as provided by law". However, a big hole in this strategy is that Jon has voted on at least one major matter - approving tuition rates for the upcoming year.

Edited by doughboy at 08:12:38 on 07/28/16

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

There is a loophole, which, if all conditions are met, would - MizzouTigerz MU

- 7/27 22:43:41

He would just have to resign from the BOC and - catbirdseat MU

- 7/28 09:27:18

Goods and service provider does not equal employee - doughboy MU

- 7/28 08:11:41

It don't believe lack of confirmation keeps from being duly - MizzouTigerz MU

- 7/28 13:43:34

I think you're right - it was a flimsy attempt - doughboy MU

- 7/28 14:15:13

He's highly qualified if you look at the requirements aside - noodle MU - 7/28 07:02:44

Sundvold will not be AD. - cooter KC - 7/28 00:37:30

First off, I didn't say he would be. I said I believe that - MizzouTigerz MU

- 7/28 13:55:36

I find it interesting that his name was not included... - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 07:51:34

Is Sundvold qualified to be the athletic director? - 615Tiger STL - 7/28 00:10:10

Dan Devine was our AD in the 60's with zero prior, nm - MU-TULSA MU - 7/28 11:01:02

If people with no AD experience should be considered, then - jrmtiger MU - 7/28 08:36:10

University of Alabama disagrees with you. - Uncle John MU

- 7/28 09:07:39

The same anecdotal sh*t you point out with Bo Ryan relative - jrmtiger MU - 7/28 12:01:52

He is a business professional, who also has a lot of - MizzouTigerz MU

- 7/28 14:08:47

Because an AD is not a "Business" person. He is mainly a - ROLLATIGER MU - 7/28 12:49:47

And goodness knows, they don't know how to run... - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 10:27:42

What about that AB guy? Why is he qualified?(nm) - tigersailor MU - 7/28 08:24:05

He is not qualified to be an AD. He would come closer to - ROLLATIGER MU - 7/28 12:50:53

He's more than "an iconic figure". He's a very successful.. - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 07:49:59

Being qualified for employment in Mizzou Athletics is not a - tigerdb MU - 7/28 06:20:29

Just as - chokingmychickenhawk MU - 7/28 06:21:50

Dumb(nm) - jrmtiger MU - 7/28 08:33:12

You can't spell dumb without tigerdb. nm - BandG MU - 7/28 10:30:01

You make no more sense than your creepy stalker - tigerdb MU - 7/28 10:49:20

And you are one negative A-hole who is very tiring to read. - BandG MU - 7/29 16:02:08

I believe he's a recess appointment and not yet confirmed(nm) - Bobk MU - 7/27 22:52:09

That is true but the definition of member of the board does - doughboy MU

- 7/28 08:14:38

I don't think you're a member of the BOC until you've been.. - Deputy Dawg MU - 7/28 10:29:34

If that is the case that why was Jon allowed to vote in the - doughboy MU

- 7/28 10:39:26

Fair enough(nm) - Bobk MU - 7/28 10:25:54

©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard