Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Did you bother to see the link? It’s the judiciary

Posted on: February 12, 2025 at 00:52:43 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
96559
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
14
website.

They even claim…

the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).”

But in typical Sue fashion… nuh uh.

You are literally advocating for lawfare yet criticizing it in your OP, and you are oblivious to that.

Edited by TigerMatt at 00:57:24 on 02/12/25
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Another day, another leftwing activist posing as a judge... - zounami MU - 2/11 20:21:21
     Judicial review isn’t a Constitutional power, but no one - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 20:56:47
          What if today, another judge said the opposite? Nm - hokie VT - 2/12 05:12:35
          it is for the Supreme Court, but not the lower courts (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:27:16
               RE: it is for the Supreme Court, but not the lower courts (nm) - meatiger MU - 2/12 07:11:17
                    The lower courts are inferior to the Executive Branch and - BH O'bonga MU - 2/12 07:18:26
                         To say nothing about Separation of Powers - BigDave MU - 2/12 08:29:15
                         RE: The lower courts are inferior to the Executive Branch and - meatiger MU - 2/12 08:15:13
               Nope. A federal court can rule on it.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:08:57
                    did you reply to the wrong post? (nm) - zounami MU - 2/12 00:14:17
                         And the Constitution doesn’t give the SCOTUS - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:18:22
                              It does actually, according to the 1803 interpretation you - zounami MU - 2/12 00:49:02
                                   Did you bother to see the link? It’s the judiciary - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:52:43
                                        Here, I'll simplify it in a way that you could potentially - zounami MU - 2/12 01:57:51
                                        Did you read my reply. The US Constitution states that all - zounami MU - 2/12 01:42:32
                                             Except the Constitution wasn’t consider law before Marbury. - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 07:55:48
                         Nope. Judicial review is a power lower courts have claimed(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:17:19
     Leftwing? Looks like he was appointed by W - playhard KC - 2/11 20:51:04
          ever notice how the Bushes & Cheneys align with Dems now? (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:20:00
          Worked for Ken Starr.. lol oops(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 20:59:27
          UNIPARTY - but yes, we all know you libtards now fully - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 20:52:52
               correct... "leftwing", "uniparty", "RINO"... all the same (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:26:29
               So basically any judge that doesn’t agree with trump is a - playhard KC - 2/11 21:05:59
                    Sorta like anyone who agrees with Trump is a Trumplican?(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 2/11 21:21:32
                    No legal standing whatsoever. Every bit of it is grotesque - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:13:10
                         It’s not lawfare. It is a temporary injunction against - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:19:33
                              The president is the boss of the executive branch, he can - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:38:59
                                   Nope. Trump can’t end the Department of Education - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:49:52
                                        I think the D.O.E. is a cabinet level agency. - Logan STL - 2/11 22:01:05
                                             Only Congress can do it.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:10:16
                                                  Wrong - as usual.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/12 08:22:01
                                                       Nope. Trump can’t do **** to close it. Congress created it. - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 08:25:36
                                                  I guess he could fire the bulk of employees and - Logan STL - 2/12 05:40:06
                                        We'll see.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:50:15
                              administrative law. please expand on that premise(nm) - tman MU - 2/11 21:20:36
                                   Those agencies took down pages that contained info - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:31:27
     It's time to start arresting judges.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 20:28:46
          You are insane.(nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 2/11 20:36:59
               Could be - but it's still time to start arresting judges. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 20:51:40
                    Maybe we just shouldn’t have judges anymore - playhard KC - 2/11 21:08:22
                         no more activist judges... and yes, that's the point (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:25:06
                         Your boy Biden ignored them - Bosalphus KC - 2/11 21:30:29
                         Personally I think we should just deport all dyck liberals - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:10:59
                              You don’t strike me as a stable individual(nm) - playhard KC - 2/11 21:20:40
                                   Ad hominem - you lose.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:37:14
                                        Not an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attack on character - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:52:05
                                             Boost up buttercup.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:56:54
               Nah that judge’s ruling is insane (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 2/11 20:38:44
     haeffb agrees with that judge(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 2/11 20:28:00
          In that federal actions should conform to law? - haeffb MU - 2/12 06:32:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard