Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
Leftwing? Looks like he was appointed by W
Posted on: February 11, 2025 at 20:51:04 CT
playhard
KC
Posts:
95592
Member For:
14.19 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Bates
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
Another day, another leftwing activist posing as a judge...
-
zounami
MU
-
2/11 20:21:21
Judicial review isn’t a Constitutional power, but no one
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/11 20:56:47
What if today, another judge said the opposite? Nm
-
hokie
VT
-
2/12 05:12:35
it is for the Supreme Court, but not the lower courts (nm)
-
zounami
MU
-
2/11 22:27:16
RE: it is for the Supreme Court, but not the lower courts (nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
2/12 07:11:17
The lower courts are inferior to the Executive Branch and
-
BH O'bonga
MU
-
2/12 07:18:26
To say nothing about Separation of Powers
-
BigDave
MU
-
2/12 08:29:15
RE: The lower courts are inferior to the Executive Branch and
-
meatiger
MU
-
2/12 08:15:13
Nope. A federal court can rule on it.(nm)
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 00:08:57
did you reply to the wrong post? (nm)
-
zounami
MU
-
2/12 00:14:17
And the Constitution doesn’t give the SCOTUS
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 00:18:22
It does actually, according to the 1803 interpretation you
-
zounami
MU
-
2/12 00:49:02
Did you bother to see the link? It’s the judiciary
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 00:52:43
Here, I'll simplify it in a way that you could potentially
-
zounami
MU
-
2/12 01:57:51
Did you read my reply. The US Constitution states that all
-
zounami
MU
-
2/12 01:42:32
Except the Constitution wasn’t consider law before Marbury.
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 07:55:48
Nope. Judicial review is a power lower courts have claimed(nm)
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 00:17:19
Leftwing? Looks like he was appointed by W
-
playhard
KC
-
2/11 20:51:04
ever notice how the Bushes & Cheneys align with Dems now? (nm)
-
zounami
MU
-
2/11 22:20:00
Worked for Ken Starr.. lol oops(nm)
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/11 20:59:27
UNIPARTY - but yes, we all know you libtards now fully
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 20:52:52
correct... "leftwing", "uniparty", "RINO"... all the same (nm)
-
zounami
MU
-
2/11 22:26:29
So basically any judge that doesn’t agree with trump is a
-
playhard
KC
-
2/11 21:05:59
Sorta like anyone who agrees with Trump is a Trumplican?(nm)
-
Wildcat
KSU
-
2/11 21:21:32
No legal standing whatsoever. Every bit of it is grotesque
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 21:13:10
It’s not lawfare. It is a temporary injunction against
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/11 21:19:33
The president is the boss of the executive branch, he can
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 21:38:59
Nope. Trump can’t end the Department of Education
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/11 21:49:52
I think the D.O.E. is a cabinet level agency.
-
Logan
STL
-
2/11 22:01:05
Only Congress can do it.(nm)
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 00:10:16
Wrong - as usual.(nm)
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/12 08:22:01
Nope. Trump can’t do **** to close it. Congress created it.
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/12 08:25:36
I guess he could fire the bulk of employees and
-
Logan
STL
-
2/12 05:40:06
We'll see.(nm)
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 21:50:15
administrative law. please expand on that premise(nm)
-
tman
MU
-
2/11 21:20:36
Those agencies took down pages that contained info
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/11 21:31:27
It's time to start arresting judges.(nm)
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 20:28:46
You are insane.(nm)
-
DC Jayhawk
KU
-
2/11 20:36:59
Could be - but it's still time to start arresting judges.
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 20:51:40
Maybe we just shouldn’t have judges anymore
-
playhard
KC
-
2/11 21:08:22
no more activist judges... and yes, that's the point (nm)
-
zounami
MU
-
2/11 22:25:06
Your boy Biden ignored them
-
Bosalphus
KC
-
2/11 21:30:29
Personally I think we should just deport all dyck liberals
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 21:10:59
You don’t strike me as a stable individual(nm)
-
playhard
KC
-
2/11 21:20:40
Ad hominem - you lose.(nm)
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 21:37:14
Not an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attack on character
-
TigerMatt
STL
-
2/11 21:52:05
Boost up buttercup.(nm)
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
2/11 21:56:54
Nah that judge’s ruling is insane (nm)
-
Bosalphus
KC
-
2/11 20:38:44
haeffb agrees with that judge(nm)
-
Fire Marshall Bill
MU
-
2/11 20:28:00
In that federal actions should conform to law?
-
haeffb
MU
-
2/12 06:32:33