Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Not an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attack on character

Posted on: February 11, 2025 at 21:52:05 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
93893
Member For:
26.31 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
28
that is irrelevant to the arguments being made.

In this case, it is directly relevant.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Another day, another leftwing activist posing as a judge... - zounami MU - 2/11 20:21:21
     Judicial review isn’t a Constitutional power, but no one - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 20:56:47
          What if today, another judge said the opposite? Nm - hokie VT - 2/12 05:12:35
          it is for the Supreme Court, but not the lower courts (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:27:16
               RE: it is for the Supreme Court, but not the lower courts (nm) - meatiger MU - 2/12 07:11:17
                    The lower courts are inferior to the Executive Branch and - BH O'bonga MU - 2/12 07:18:26
                         To say nothing about Separation of Powers - BigDave MU - 2/12 08:29:15
                         RE: The lower courts are inferior to the Executive Branch and - meatiger MU - 2/12 08:15:13
               Nope. A federal court can rule on it.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:08:57
                    did you reply to the wrong post? (nm) - zounami MU - 2/12 00:14:17
                         And the Constitution doesn’t give the SCOTUS - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:18:22
                              It does actually, according to the 1803 interpretation you - zounami MU - 2/12 00:49:02
                                   Did you bother to see the link? It’s the judiciary - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:52:43
                                        Here, I'll simplify it in a way that you could potentially - zounami MU - 2/12 01:57:51
                                        Did you read my reply. The US Constitution states that all - zounami MU - 2/12 01:42:32
                                             Except the Constitution wasn’t consider law before Marbury. - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 07:55:48
                         Nope. Judicial review is a power lower courts have claimed(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:17:19
     Leftwing? Looks like he was appointed by W - playhard KC - 2/11 20:51:04
          ever notice how the Bushes & Cheneys align with Dems now? (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:20:00
          Worked for Ken Starr.. lol oops(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 20:59:27
          UNIPARTY - but yes, we all know you libtards now fully - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 20:52:52
               correct... "leftwing", "uniparty", "RINO"... all the same (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:26:29
               So basically any judge that doesn’t agree with trump is a - playhard KC - 2/11 21:05:59
                    Sorta like anyone who agrees with Trump is a Trumplican?(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 2/11 21:21:32
                    No legal standing whatsoever. Every bit of it is grotesque - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:13:10
                         It’s not lawfare. It is a temporary injunction against - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:19:33
                              The president is the boss of the executive branch, he can - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:38:59
                                   Nope. Trump can’t end the Department of Education - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:49:52
                                        I think the D.O.E. is a cabinet level agency. - Logan STL - 2/11 22:01:05
                                             Only Congress can do it.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 00:10:16
                                                  Wrong - as usual.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/12 08:22:01
                                                       Nope. Trump can’t do **** to close it. Congress created it. - TigerMatt STL - 2/12 08:25:36
                                                  I guess he could fire the bulk of employees and - Logan STL - 2/12 05:40:06
                                        We'll see.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:50:15
                              administrative law. please expand on that premise(nm) - tman MU - 2/11 21:20:36
                                   Those agencies took down pages that contained info - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:31:27
     It's time to start arresting judges.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 20:28:46
          You are insane.(nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 2/11 20:36:59
               Could be - but it's still time to start arresting judges. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 20:51:40
                    Maybe we just shouldn’t have judges anymore - playhard KC - 2/11 21:08:22
                         no more activist judges... and yes, that's the point (nm) - zounami MU - 2/11 22:25:06
                         Your boy Biden ignored them - Bosalphus KC - 2/11 21:30:29
                         Personally I think we should just deport all dyck liberals - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:10:59
                              You don’t strike me as a stable individual(nm) - playhard KC - 2/11 21:20:40
                                   Ad hominem - you lose.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:37:14
                                        Not an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attack on character - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 21:52:05
                                             Boost up buttercup.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 2/11 21:56:54
               Nah that judge’s ruling is insane (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 2/11 20:38:44
     haeffb agrees with that judge(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 2/11 20:28:00
          In that federal actions should conform to law? - haeffb MU - 2/12 06:32:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard