 |
|
correct... "Engelmayer's order is legally indefensible...
Posted on: February 10, 2025 at 21:18:05 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
72138
Member For:
10.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him.
Instead, he fabricates a fiction: That the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats — who answer to no voters — control the nation's finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence."
It's also a subversion of our democracy. The people voted for the President and, in turn, his duly appointed cabinet members to run the executive branch. They did NOT vote for the "unelected bureaucrats" nor are any constitutional powers granted to them.
Edited by zounami at 21:21:13 on 02/10/25
Instead, he fabricates a fiction: That the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats — who answer to no voters — control the nation's finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence."
It's also a subversion of our democracy. The people voted for the President and, in turn, his duly appointed cabinet members to run the executive branch. They did NOT vote for the "unelected bureaucrats" nor are any constitutional powers granted to them.
Edited by zounami at 21:21:13 on 02/10/25
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
correct... "Engelmayer's order is legally indefensible... - zounami MU - 2/10 21:18:05