Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Exactly - this is what he was looking to have done

Posted on: January 23, 2025 at 16:29:33 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
125906
Member For:
22.56 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
Have the court review the earlier decision and decide what is meant by "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." It is a worthy question and one benefitting from a fresh look.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Federal judge denies Trump can amend the Constitution - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/23 16:02:08
     why are you stupid? (nm) - pickle MU - 1/23 19:14:58
     Nothing gets by you(nm) - Panthera MU - 1/23 17:27:44
     The whole purpose was to get it into courts, and then the - shorty MU - 1/23 17:09:58
          SCOTUS probably won't even grant certiorari on this, - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/23 18:49:42
               I wouldn't bet much money on that............... - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 1/23 19:44:10
          ^^^Yes^^^ what it was written for....The 1st and 2nd apply - tigertix MU - 1/23 17:32:36
     another octogenarian in govt (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 17:03:32
          Like the almost octagenarian that signed the EO? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/23 18:50:27
               no, it's right there in your post (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 19:48:54
          Yes, he's 83 and nowhere to go except on the bench like - tigertix MU - 1/23 17:38:19
               RE: Yes, he's 83 and nowhere to go except on the bench like - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 17:52:12
     did you know - 90Tiger STL - 1/23 16:57:43
     "A judge is a perpetual law student who grades their own - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 1/23 16:33:15
     RE: Federal judge denies Trump can amend the Constitution - Outsider MU - 1/23 16:20:25
     Trump is not amending the Constitution. Much like in Roe, - Spanky KU - 1/23 16:08:46
          No. SCOTUS shouldnt hear this case, it's so bad. Of course, - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/23 18:54:23
          this is correct. There are elements of Kim Ark that the - 90Tiger STL - 1/23 16:58:52
          Even if they say the kid is a citizen. The parents are not(nm) - tman MU - 1/23 16:13:24
               Where do people (millions) , like Vivek, who were born here - pinkman MU - 1/23 16:53:19
                    Vivek was born to legal residents and his mother - 90Tiger STL - 1/23 17:00:54
                         So basically, he wouldn't be a citizen under this EO sonce - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/23 18:56:56
                         Legal residence of parents could be a possible definition nm - pinkman MU - 1/23 17:08:21
                              Apparently it can be whatever you want, textualism be damned - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/23 18:58:28
                         if the EO were in affect when he was born, he wouldn't be - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 17:06:50
                              I know, his mom did become a citizen "shortly after" he was - 90Tiger STL - 1/23 18:03:10
                              Are you certain his parents were not citizens or - Spanky KU - 1/23 17:25:43
                                   they weren't citizens, but not certain of visa/greencard - SwampTiger MU - 1/23 17:44:10
                         He was born to two Indian citizens in America - Columbian Gold MU - 1/23 17:03:34
                              RE: He was born to two Indian citizens in America - 90Tiger STL - 1/23 18:03:46
                    RE: Where do people (millions) , like Vivek, who were born here - Outsider MU - 1/23 16:59:57
               That is not what the EO is about - Spanky KU - 1/23 16:26:02
     Brilliant move by Trump to get the discussion started... - Logan STL - 1/23 16:07:12
          Exactly - this is what he was looking to have done - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/23 16:29:33
          Forcing it to SCOTUS is a very wise move - BigDave MU - 1/23 16:11:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard