Welcome Guest

That is not what is argued by Hobbes.

Posted on: January 6, 2025 at 10:51:32 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144653
Member For:
20.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
From my post:

Hobbes thinks all humans are equal when it comes to matters of survival. Nobody is powerful enough to be immune to attack. Even the weakest person can kill the strongest if there’s nobody around to stop them.[3]

In the state of nature, this equal ability to kill each other leads to mistrust. All of your belongings, and your life itself, might be taken at any moment, because there is no greater power to stop anyone from attacking you.

Some people would attack you because they need your resources to survive. Others would attack you because they want to be more powerful than everyone else. Even those who don’t need or want to attack you are a danger, because they can’t trust that you will leave them alone, so to be safe, they must attack you first.[4]

The end result is that the state of nature consists of a war of all against all.[5] You must constantly be ready to fight, even if you’d prefer not to, because the only way to ensure your safety is to go after others before they go after you.[6]

In this state of nature, projects like farming, manufacturing, science, and the arts are a waste of time, because there’s no guarantee you’ll enjoy the fruits of your labor. Someone can take it from you at any moment. Everyone lives in “continual fear and danger of violent death.”[7] It’s awful!

Hobbes says that if you doubt it would be so bad, think about how you act under your existing government. Even with the police just a phone call away, don’t you lock your doors when you sleep at night?

According to Hobbes, if you can’t trust your neighbors to leave you alone even when there are laws against theft and assault, imagine how much worse it would be if people were free to do anything they thought was necessary to survive in the state of nature.[8]
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Anarchism without Hyphens - pickle MU - 1/6 09:29:02
     RE: Anarchism without Hyphens - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/6 10:51:43
     To an anarchist, the "state of nature" is preferable.. - Spanky KU - 1/6 10:26:40
          No. Anarchists aren’t some monolithic group. Hobbes was - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 10:43:11
               That is not what is argued by Hobbes. - Spanky KU - 1/6 10:51:32
                    Go read Leviathan. Hobbes argues that people are depraved. - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 11:10:26
                         Nope - Spanky KU - 1/6 11:22:41
                              You keep posting the same inaccurate summary over and over. - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 11:37:30
                                   why would 'depraved men' enter into a 'social contract'? - Spanky KU - 1/6 11:43:44
                                        Because even depraved men realize there are stronger - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 11:57:45
                                        wait.. you think men enter into this so-called - Seagull MU - 1/6 11:57:13
     Anarchism without rank stupidity - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/6 10:25:31
          It is not an unreasonable theory.... it depends on - Spanky KU - 1/6 10:35:44
               no, that’s incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 1/6 11:31:17
                    RE: no, that’s incorrect (nm) - Spanky KU - 1/6 11:44:12
               There is no presumption in anarchy that “all men will act - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 10:44:39
                    There certainly is.(nm) - Spanky KU - 1/6 10:52:49
                         You are completely wrong, warped by Catholic dogma of - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 11:13:07
                              How does an anarchist deal with a "Liberty Valance"? - Spanky KU - 1/6 11:24:16
                                   Who says there is one single answer? Your entire worldview - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 11:52:27
                                        "cooperatively denying the sale of goods and services to - Spanky KU - 1/6 11:58:38
                                             And if they can’t access the roads, can’t buy fuel from - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 12:04:16
                                                  Who stops Liberty Valance from using the road and taking - Spanky KU - 1/6 12:42:47
                                                       You aren’t thinking well. The owners of the road and - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 12:58:28
                                        Nice laydown. Answer the question. - Spanky KU - 1/6 11:56:58
                                             I already did. You can’t grasp that not everyone has the - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 12:02:38
                                                  Who has the right/authority to "exile" Liberty Valance?(nm) - Spanky KU - 1/6 12:03:54
                                                       The property owners. You seem to not understand the concept - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 12:05:06
                                                            what can the property owners do when Liberty Valance - Spanky KU - 1/6 12:14:39
                                                                 Defend your property, just like today, but without having - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 12:17:50
                                                                      Shoot Liberty Valance? - Spanky KU - 1/6 12:51:21
                                                                           Sure, why not… though it most likely would be contracted - TigerMatt KC - 1/6 12:55:35
                                                                                So a contract killing that would (likely) spur a revenge - Spanky KU - 1/6 13:38:16
     RE: Anarchism without Hyphens - MUTGR MU - 1/6 10:06:37
          ok (nm) - pickle MU - 1/6 10:55:49
     would the hyphen just represent personal preference? - SwampTiger MU - 1/6 09:44:22
          the author thinks so - pickle MU - 1/6 10:05:08




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard