Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Fine but to get back to my original point

Posted on: June 8, 2023 at 14:11:53 CT

Genco98 MU

Posts:

15088

Member For:

6.01 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

The "truth" whatever it is, has NEVER been vetted. That was my point. Not the "speculation" or fan board talk or media talking heads speculating or "sources expect Mizzou to go to the Big Ten". That is my only real point. No one in the public or fandom really has a clue what really went on and all the arrogant BS thrown both ways.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

The Texas/OU/Pac and Mizzou/SEC time lines - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/7 23:03:01

Thanks for posting! - Otto MU - 6/8 12:58:08

i'd suggest a more reliable source than scottsdale - phrejd MU - 6/8 13:23:16

You're being far too kind - hou4mu MU - 6/8 13:29:24

I didn't see that much I didn't know about - Merlin KC - 6/8 14:11:09

good grief (nm) - phrejd MU - 6/8 10:54:30

The Interview was on the Web, I'll see if I can post a link - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/8 09:56:53

Those were crazy times .... remember Purple Cat - Otto MU - 6/8 13:14:17

Alden recounted approaching the SEC - Genco98 MU - 6/8 10:24:52

Nobody believes we talked to the Big 10 a second time - alwaysright MU - 6/8 10:44:24

Do the research, there's a string of Tribune articles - nm - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/8 12:41:22

"Believes" - Genco98 MU - 6/8 11:36:29

Skeptics should review the info on the Tribune's web site nm - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/8 13:09:08

It would be ludicrous for MU to have done so. We talked - alwaysright MU - 6/8 12:05:59

Where is it documented we "talked to the Big 10" - Genco98 MU - 6/8 12:11:22

Late 2009, Big 10 says they’re going to consider - alwaysright MU - 6/8 12:43:57

Again it's just hearsay - Genco98 MU - 6/8 12:55:19

Nobody on either side of any of these sort of - alwaysright MU - 6/8 13:08:33

It's 13 years later - Genco98 MU - 6/8 14:05:04

The truth could still make somebody look bad. - alwaysright MU - 6/8 14:06:18

Fine but to get back to my original point - Genco98 MU - 6/8 14:11:53

RE: Fine but to get back to my original point - hangman MU - 6/8 20:41:28

I’m not arguing they didn’t talk - Genco98 MU - 6/8 21:03:43

RE: I’m not arguing they didn’t talk - hangman MU - 6/9 07:58:25

I disagree - Genco98 MU - 6/9 10:40:57

RE: I disagree - hangman MU - 6/9 13:48:32

“I know a member of the Board of Curators” - Genco98 MU - 6/10 09:48:30

Your never going to get what you want. - alwaysright MU - 6/8 14:56:37

i have it on very good authority that MU and b10 were in - phrejd MU - 6/8 13:28:46

Yeah but show me a newspaper article about it 🙄 - alwaysright MU - 6/8 14:05:27

oh i'm sure they talked. there are a thousand informal - phrejd MU - 6/8 14:07:49

I get it but it still doesn't get off my original point - Genco98 MU - 6/8 14:02:59

RE: I get it but it still doesn't get off my original point - hangman MU - 6/8 20:43:16

i don't disagree (nm) - phrejd MU - 6/8 14:05:19

speculation or smoke, idk ... - tmcats KSU - 6/8 13:02:57

that seems about right to me as an outsider but ... - tmcats KSU - 6/8 12:54:20

Brady Deaton, not Brad Deaton (nm) - KCT-BoneTiger MU

- 6/8 09:41:35

This is like the Cliffs Notes version of the Cliffs notes - alwaysright MU - 6/8 08:41:38

What is the "appropriate publication? - Genco98 MU - 6/8 07:23:40

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard