Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Yeah but show me a newspaper article about it 🙄

Posted on: June 8, 2023 at 14:05:27 CT

alwaysright MU

Posts:

52713

Member For:

17.99 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

To deny that Mizzou in the Big Ten conference spoke in 2009 or 2010 is to call Brady Deaton a liar. I’m not making any claims about how far it went or how close it got, but they absolutely talked.
Brady Deaton said they would investigate all possibilities, I believe he used the phrase “due diligence“. To say that they didn’t speak means that Deaton lied.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

The Texas/OU/Pac and Mizzou/SEC time lines - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/7 23:03:01

Thanks for posting! - Otto MU - 6/8 12:58:08

i'd suggest a more reliable source than scottsdale - phrejd MU - 6/8 13:23:16

You're being far too kind - hou4mu MU - 6/8 13:29:24

I didn't see that much I didn't know about - Merlin KC - 6/8 14:11:09

good grief (nm) - phrejd MU - 6/8 10:54:30

The Interview was on the Web, I'll see if I can post a link - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/8 09:56:53

Those were crazy times .... remember Purple Cat - Otto MU - 6/8 13:14:17

Alden recounted approaching the SEC - Genco98 MU - 6/8 10:24:52

Nobody believes we talked to the Big 10 a second time - alwaysright MU - 6/8 10:44:24

Do the research, there's a string of Tribune articles - nm - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/8 12:41:22

"Believes" - Genco98 MU - 6/8 11:36:29

Skeptics should review the info on the Tribune's web site nm - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/8 13:09:08

It would be ludicrous for MU to have done so. We talked - alwaysright MU - 6/8 12:05:59

Where is it documented we "talked to the Big 10" - Genco98 MU - 6/8 12:11:22

Late 2009, Big 10 says they’re going to consider - alwaysright MU - 6/8 12:43:57

Again it's just hearsay - Genco98 MU - 6/8 12:55:19

Nobody on either side of any of these sort of - alwaysright MU - 6/8 13:08:33

It's 13 years later - Genco98 MU - 6/8 14:05:04

The truth could still make somebody look bad. - alwaysright MU - 6/8 14:06:18

Fine but to get back to my original point - Genco98 MU - 6/8 14:11:53

RE: Fine but to get back to my original point - hangman MU - 6/8 20:41:28

I’m not arguing they didn’t talk - Genco98 MU - 6/8 21:03:43

RE: I’m not arguing they didn’t talk - hangman MU - 6/9 07:58:25

I disagree - Genco98 MU - 6/9 10:40:57

RE: I disagree - hangman MU - 6/9 13:48:32

“I know a member of the Board of Curators” - Genco98 MU - 6/10 09:48:30

Your never going to get what you want. - alwaysright MU - 6/8 14:56:37

i have it on very good authority that MU and b10 were in - phrejd MU - 6/8 13:28:46

Yeah but show me a newspaper article about it 🙄 - alwaysright MU - 6/8 14:05:27

oh i'm sure they talked. there are a thousand informal - phrejd MU - 6/8 14:07:49

I get it but it still doesn't get off my original point - Genco98 MU - 6/8 14:02:59

RE: I get it but it still doesn't get off my original point - hangman MU - 6/8 20:43:16

i don't disagree (nm) - phrejd MU - 6/8 14:05:19

speculation or smoke, idk ... - tmcats KSU - 6/8 13:02:57

that seems about right to me as an outsider but ... - tmcats KSU - 6/8 12:54:20

Brady Deaton, not Brad Deaton (nm) - KCT-BoneTiger MU

- 6/8 09:41:35

This is like the Cliffs Notes version of the Cliffs notes - alwaysright MU - 6/8 08:41:38

What is the "appropriate publication? - Genco98 MU - 6/8 07:23:40

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard