Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Nice catch spanky. The reason for SCOTUS is because there

Posted on: June 30, 2022 at 10:27:29 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
63993
Member For:
8.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
are different ways to interpret a document written 240 years ago.

Eight of the best legal minds and one wise latina are evenly split on the interpretation. The number referring to legal minds will decrease by one at noon today.

When the unicorn cult posts they act as if they have it all figured out and anyone on SCOTUS who disagrees is is a big government tyrant.

I said in an earlier post that i don't know the legal implications of the case and am not sure what the constitutionality of the decision will turn on.

(Paraphrasing my earlier post).

If the court properly interpreted the constitution then they did the right thing, whether i like it or not. It would then be up to congress to codify what they want the law to be.

But they are too lazy and cowardly to take that up. Let the courts do it, they don't have to stand for reelection.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Hokie, have you ever read the Constitution - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:00:54
     Yes, a few years ago. Will there be a test? nm - hokie VT - 6/30 10:03:38
          Pickle is keeping a spreadsheet (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/30 10:05:28
               Totally off topic question - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 10:06:45
                    I'd read.(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/30 10:07:49
          Where is immigration in the Constitution? - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:05:16
               The Migration and Importation Clause - Spanky KU - 6/30 10:17:18
                    Nice catch spanky. The reason for SCOTUS is because there - hokie VT - 6/30 10:27:29
                         The clause cited by Spanky involved slaves. Not even - ummmm MU - 6/30 10:35:06
                              A slave is not a migrant - Spanky KU - 6/30 10:43:05
                                   Okay, but that doesn't change the widely accepted original - ummmm MU - 6/30 10:45:37
                                        Words have meaning and the 1803 Congress used that clause - Spanky KU - 6/30 11:08:03
                                        When we use terms like "widely accepted intent" of the - hokie VT - 6/30 10:59:55
                                             The ratification debates were recorded (nm) - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:15:06
                                                  Send us that transcript(nm) - Spanky KU - 6/30 11:38:39
                                             I'm not talking about scholars. I'm talking about the actual - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:02:59
                                                  Southern states disagreed that is was limited to the slave - Spanky KU - 6/30 11:47:58
                                                  this settles it - ashtray UF - 6/30 11:17:04
                                                  Sorry, no sale. In your own post it says "This suggests" - hokie VT - 6/30 11:15:41
                                                       Here's source material from Madison (not too hard to - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:27:23
                                                            You say i've never heard of this clause and then you say in - hokie VT - 6/30 11:37:42
                                                                 Yes, you had not heard of this clause before today - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:46:42
                                                                      this all goes to show that the so-called "conservatives" - ashtray UF - 6/30 11:53:54
                                                                      Shouldn't you look at EVERYONE'S writing and not just - hokie VT - 6/30 11:53:27
                                                                           You said it after acknowledging immigration - pickle MU - 6/30 13:41:17
                                                                           You should look at everyone's writings who framed and - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:08:15
                                                       The Constitution does not say all persons born in the US - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:17:44
                         He’s wrong, though. - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:30:17
                              Nope(nm) - Spanky KU - 6/30 10:43:50
               I don't believe it's there. Your point....? Please don't - hokie VT - 6/30 10:12:36
                    Then that means it’s a power reserved to the states - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:15:52
                         So if texas wanted a border wall and california wanted no - hokie VT - 6/30 10:18:01
                              I don’t know what you mean by “that should work” - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:20:46
                              that's irrelevant to the fact that it's unconstiutional - ashtray UF - 6/30 10:20:22
          You do realize this is a double handle, right? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 10:04:59
               Can't be. Using a double handle to get around a mobbing - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/30 10:07:05
                    Pretty ironic to be preaching property rights - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/30 10:10:04
                         Dob't tell me i'm actually engaging pinkle when i respond to - hokie VT - 6/30 10:15:41
                              You are (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/30 10:20:45
                              He's not even hiding it. (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/30 10:17:48
               Didn't know? Who is it? Doesn't seem worth talking - hokie VT - 6/30 10:06:26
                    Or the real thing - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 10:07:13
                         Gotta admit, his posts do have that stench about them. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 10:08:10
                              Since you have read the Constitution - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:09:53
                                   Answered above. Try not to be an ass. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 10:13:13
                                        I’m not the one being abrasive - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:17:07
                                             People i trust have outed you. We're done here. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 10:18:46
                                                  Are you afraid of discussion? (nm) - Wilco MU - 6/30 10:21:28
                                                  lol 🍪 (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/30 10:19:42
                                                  lol... run away coward (nm) - ashtray UF - 6/30 10:19:03
          This Board is a test. - Newcatbirdseat MU - 6/30 10:04:20




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard