Welcome Guest

When your moral code is derived solely from some

Posted on: October 18, 2021 at 18:50:57 CT
MUTGR MU
Posts:
67307
Member For:
24.15 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
theory of "property rights", you come up with this evil:

"Applying our theory to parents and children, this means that a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also that the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.[2] The law, therefore, may not properly compel the parent to feed a child or to keep it alive.[3]""

No wonder you don't get any traction.

Edited by MUTGR at 18:52:20 on 10/18/21
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Children and Rights - pickle MU - 10/18 15:50:56
     When your moral code is derived solely from some - MUTGR MU - 10/18 18:50:57
          if you had any critical reading skills - pickle MU - 10/18 18:58:03
     You show why rejecting God results in a perversely evil - JeffB MU - 10/18 16:10:55
          RE: You show why rejecting God results in a perversely evil - MUTGR MU - 10/18 18:54:12
               well - pickle MU - 10/18 18:59:44
          Is he incorrect - meatiger MU - 10/18 16:18:32
               he’s never read it (nm) - pickle MU - 10/18 16:38:06
                    You are either a liar or very careless with the facts. - JeffB MU - 10/18 17:46:23
                         RE: You are either a liar or very careless with the facts. - MUTGR MU - 10/18 19:06:20
               Sure there are, and there are all too many parents who would - JeffB MU - 10/18 16:24:37
     "it is clear that a newborn babe is in no natural sense an - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 16:07:59
          keep reading (nm) - pickle MU - 10/18 16:17:08
               at any point in the argument that uses "at birth" it is - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 16:33:29
                    The only objective ontological change takes place at - JeffB MU - 10/18 17:41:52
                    no, that’s an incorrect assumption (nm) - pickle MU - 10/18 16:39:07
                         it is in conflict with the author's subjective claims - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 16:42:16
                              it isn’t - pickle MU - 10/18 16:50:32
                                   A rose by any other name is still a rose. - JeffB MU - 10/18 17:45:23
                                   to reinterate - I'm not arguing against his claim that a - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 17:20:34
                                   that isn't an assumption. it is fact that the author - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 17:16:57




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard