Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

to reinterate - I'm not arguing against his claim that a

Posted on: October 18, 2021 at 17:20:34 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
63068
Member For:
23.75 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
parent can't be forced to provide for the child.

I'm questioning WHEN the protection against agression starts.

How can it be protected from agression after birth but NOT before birth?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Children and Rights - pickle MU - 10/18 15:50:56
     When your moral code is derived solely from some - MUTGR MU - 10/18 18:50:57
          if you had any critical reading skills - pickle MU - 10/18 18:58:03
     You show why rejecting God results in a perversely evil - JeffB MU - 10/18 16:10:55
          RE: You show why rejecting God results in a perversely evil - MUTGR MU - 10/18 18:54:12
               well - pickle MU - 10/18 18:59:44
          Is he incorrect - meatiger MU - 10/18 16:18:32
               he’s never read it (nm) - pickle MU - 10/18 16:38:06
                    You are either a liar or very careless with the facts. - JeffB MU - 10/18 17:46:23
                         RE: You are either a liar or very careless with the facts. - MUTGR MU - 10/18 19:06:20
               Sure there are, and there are all too many parents who would - JeffB MU - 10/18 16:24:37
     "it is clear that a newborn babe is in no natural sense an - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 16:07:59
          keep reading (nm) - pickle MU - 10/18 16:17:08
               at any point in the argument that uses "at birth" it is - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 16:33:29
                    The only objective ontological change takes place at - JeffB MU - 10/18 17:41:52
                    no, that’s an incorrect assumption (nm) - pickle MU - 10/18 16:39:07
                         it is in conflict with the author's subjective claims - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 16:42:16
                              it isn’t - pickle MU - 10/18 16:50:32
                                   A rose by any other name is still a rose. - JeffB MU - 10/18 17:45:23
                                   to reinterate - I'm not arguing against his claim that a - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 17:20:34
                                   that isn't an assumption. it is fact that the author - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/18 17:16:57




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard