Welcome Guest

You dropped Ehrman's name three times

Posted on: April 4, 2021 at 16:06:06 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188079
Member For:
24.81 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I said I am only recently aware of a few of his lectures.

He does state the figure who wrote Luke/Acts was a companion of Paul? So ?

And Doofus, I write in 2021 about the death of JFK, does that mean I am writing 1963 ? You logic blows bud. Mark writes in 70, followed a decade or so later by the figure known as Matthew. Luke comes later.

Ehrman "ignores prophecy" ? Now you are cracking me up.

Mark - the first writes to a very Jewish audience following the destruction of the Temple which occurs in 70 friend. Mathew and Luke use good chunks of Mark when they write their separate books.

The "wealthy and educated" were not followers of the Nazarene pal. The Wealthy and educated" do not live in impoverished rural Palestine. His earliest followers with the very poor. History tells that story.

Your attacks on Bart Ehrman are pretty funny and quite a bit defensive.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Jesus died for your sins - JG MU - 4/4 01:42:04
     Disagreeing with you is not sinning (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 4/4 13:37:12
     You first, denounce abortion on demand.....nm - tigertix MU - 4/4 10:04:11
     I don't really want to go to Wiki again but - Newcatbirdseat MU - 4/4 09:13:22
          Jesus dying for sins - metaphor on Jewish Passover tradition - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:40:43
               Too much Ehrman. Form criticism is highly flawed. Look - TigerMatt STL - 4/4 10:18:58
                    Hey buddy boy. No - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 11:18:10
                         Average lifespan numbers are BS. Those are brought down by - TigerMatt STL - 4/4 12:31:45
                              His followers could not read - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 12:43:50
                                   Again you are dead wrong on multiple facets. Ehrman - TigerMatt STL - 4/4 12:51:59
                                        You dropped Ehrman's name three times - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 16:06:06
     Nothing wrong with sinning. It is expected - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:09:46
     What if we don't sin?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 07:35:10
          Then you are not honest - but then if you are too honest - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:12:17
               Your argument makes no sense at all .(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 11:07:55
                    To covet is a sin, multiple sins in fact - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 11:27:55
                         You can covet without wanting or taking it from - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 13:01:15
                              THE DEFINITION Gat is to desire, to WANT(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 16:20:28
          We all do - alzoo MU - 4/4 08:46:35
               We all fall short. But there are people - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 08:58:06
                    Most all miss the mark, covetousness is a sin for starters.(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:41:47
                         Covetness of what? Be specific .(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 11:02:38
                              Jesus Christ old man, grow up, you w/out sing ha ha(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 11:28:46
                    That’s silly. Everyone is flawed. FLAW still has - hokie VT - 4/4 09:22:03
                         Your post is at best contradictory. Yes, everyone is - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 11:06:18
                         Do you even know that the very thing you say is the basis - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:45:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard