Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Again you are dead wrong on multiple facets. Ehrman

Posted on: April 4, 2021 at 12:51:59 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
96727
Member For:
26.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ignores that Luke was a companion of Paul and never records the deaths of Paul or Peter, like he does with Stephen, in Acts which places composition before 64 AD.

Ehrman is forced to date the Gospels at a later time because he ignores prophecy. So to him, and others some of these writings have to have happened after 70AD.

Ehrman clings so hard on this narrative that no one could read, ignoring there were wealthy and educated among the earliest followers. It is all guesses on his part, not evidentiary based.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Jesus died for your sins - JG MU - 4/4 01:42:04
     Disagreeing with you is not sinning (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 4/4 13:37:12
     You first, denounce abortion on demand.....nm - tigertix MU - 4/4 10:04:11
     I don't really want to go to Wiki again but - Newcatbirdseat MU - 4/4 09:13:22
          Jesus dying for sins - metaphor on Jewish Passover tradition - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:40:43
               Too much Ehrman. Form criticism is highly flawed. Look - TigerMatt STL - 4/4 10:18:58
                    Hey buddy boy. No - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 11:18:10
                         Average lifespan numbers are BS. Those are brought down by - TigerMatt STL - 4/4 12:31:45
                              His followers could not read - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 12:43:50
                                   Again you are dead wrong on multiple facets. Ehrman - TigerMatt STL - 4/4 12:51:59
                                        You dropped Ehrman's name three times - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 16:06:06
     Nothing wrong with sinning. It is expected - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:09:46
     What if we don't sin?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 07:35:10
          Then you are not honest - but then if you are too honest - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:12:17
               Your argument makes no sense at all .(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 11:07:55
                    To covet is a sin, multiple sins in fact - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 11:27:55
                         You can covet without wanting or taking it from - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 13:01:15
                              THE DEFINITION Gat is to desire, to WANT(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 16:20:28
          We all do - alzoo MU - 4/4 08:46:35
               We all fall short. But there are people - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 08:58:06
                    Most all miss the mark, covetousness is a sin for starters.(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:41:47
                         Covetness of what? Be specific .(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 11:02:38
                              Jesus Christ old man, grow up, you w/out sing ha ha(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 11:28:46
                    That’s silly. Everyone is flawed. FLAW still has - hokie VT - 4/4 09:22:03
                         Your post is at best contradictory. Yes, everyone is - GA Tiger MU - 4/4 11:06:18
                         Do you even know that the very thing you say is the basis - raskolnikov MU - 4/4 09:45:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard