Welcome Guest

RE: That is a very odd response from Sullivan

Posted on: June 1, 2020 at 17:11:01 CT

BH O'bonga MU

Posts:

26511

Member For:

5.64 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Wilkinson cited case law that was not binding and furthermore that particular case was superseded by the Focker case that was binding precedent and was even within the same District.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Sullivan gives the DC circuit Court the finger. - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/1 15:39:04

RE: Sullivan: Beth Wilkenson's brief is long on emotion and - BH O'bonga MU - 6/1 15:59:05

RE: Sullivan: Beth Wilkenson's brief is long on emotion and - scan MU - 6/1 16:00:23

RE: Sullivan: Beth Wilkenson's brief is long on emotion and - BH O'bonga MU - 6/1 16:03:55

He doesn't and shouldn't(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/1 15:55:45

RE: He doesn't and shouldn't: Oh yes, he should. The - BH O'bonga MU - 6/1 16:38:31

incorrect (nm) - Sal MU

- 6/1 16:12:26

RE: He doesn't and shouldn't(nm) - scan MU - 6/1 15:59:07

The dude is as demented as Dirty Joe(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 6/1 15:45:01

That is a very odd response from Sullivan - Sal MU

- 6/1 15:41:53

RE: That is a very odd response from Sullivan - BH O'bonga MU - 6/1 17:11:01