Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

They should have left off 'EVERY YEAR'. Replacement level

Posted on: January 6, 2020 at 08:59:59 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72837
Member For:
21.59 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
requires an average of about 2.1 births per woman to keep a population from going down. But the way that sentence reads, we need 2.1 births per woman EVERY YEAR to maintain replacement level population.

"Every year, there must be at least 2,100 births per 1,000 women to be considered at or above replacement level."
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Anchor Babies Exceeding U.S. Births in 48 States... - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:26:47
     lol (nm) - pickle MU - 1/6 08:12:36
     You need babies. Period - raskolnikov MU - 1/6 06:52:16
          If you didn't have to deal with the mafia.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/6 07:12:07
     While indidnt read it....SOOOOOOO? - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/5 22:14:37
     Iam4Mizzou needs to tone his procreation down a bit - Calca STL - 1/5 22:12:09
          Is he a professional anchor baby daddy? (nm) - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:14:43
               He stole someone elses Bar Exam identify - Calca STL - 1/5 22:19:39
     It's been the plan for sometime. nm. - MUTGR MU - 1/5 21:53:32
          IT'S A GODDAMN PLOT - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/5 22:19:13
     Derp - JayHoaxH8r MU - 1/5 21:52:36
     I read the title and knew immediately it was a scam. (nm) - Newcatbirdseat MU - 1/5 21:34:59
          how is it a scam? says the # of anchor babies exceeds the - blake1771 MU - 1/5 21:38:01
               that's what the title suggests but not what the text says - gmmm98 MU - 1/6 06:17:55
          Not a scam - meatiger MU - 1/5 21:35:54
               Right, so it's a scam. (nm) - Newcatbirdseat MU - 1/5 21:37:28
     What a misleading article - meatiger MU - 1/5 21:31:24
          It's Breitbart...and it has a certain audience - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/5 23:58:13
          The headline can be misleading, but if a new state was - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:36:39
               OK (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/6 10:08:03
               That is a retarded statement - meatiger MU - 1/5 21:39:54
                    Reword it if you like. The # of anchor babies born in the US - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:47:48
                         Of course Texas & California are probably among the states - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:02:38
                         RE: Reword it if you like. The # of anchor babies born in the US - meatiger MU - 1/5 22:01:10
                              OK. About 372,000 anchor babies born in the US in 2019. - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:12:41
                                   And that means absolutely nothing - meatiger MU - 1/5 22:16:36
                                        It gives a little scope as to the size of the # of anchor - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:40:31
                                             falling birth rates are the reason countries have - ashtray UF - 1/6 10:14:15
                                             States mean nothing - meatiger MU - 1/5 22:50:49
                                                  'at least 4.5 million anchor babies in the US < 18-years-old - JeffB MU - 1/5 23:15:11
     U.S. birth rate below replacement level... - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:31:10
          Wut? - TigerMatt STL - 1/5 22:13:53
               RE: Wut? - see below... - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:15:55
          lol at the last sentence (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/5 21:47:31
               Why? - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:52:58
                    What are the first two words? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/5 21:54:39
                         OK, their bad. They should have left off 'every year'. (nm) - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:59:24
                              Why? - Grasslands MU - 1/6 06:44:50
                                   They should have left off 'EVERY YEAR'. Replacement level - JeffB MU - 1/6 08:59:59
                         OMG, we're not having enough twins and - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/5 21:59:03
          Arabic names have moved into the top 10 baby names in US - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:32:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard