Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Wut?

Posted on: January 5, 2020 at 22:13:53 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
96399
Member For:
26.43 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"Every year, there must be at least 2,100 births per 1,000 women to be considered at or above replacement level."

That makes no sense. Every woman must have 2.1 births a year?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Anchor Babies Exceeding U.S. Births in 48 States... - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:26:47
     lol (nm) - pickle MU - 1/6 08:12:36
     You need babies. Period - raskolnikov MU - 1/6 06:52:16
          If you didn't have to deal with the mafia.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/6 07:12:07
     While indidnt read it....SOOOOOOO? - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/5 22:14:37
     Iam4Mizzou needs to tone his procreation down a bit - Calca STL - 1/5 22:12:09
          Is he a professional anchor baby daddy? (nm) - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:14:43
               He stole someone elses Bar Exam identify - Calca STL - 1/5 22:19:39
     It's been the plan for sometime. nm. - MUTGR MU - 1/5 21:53:32
          IT'S A GODDAMN PLOT - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/5 22:19:13
     Derp - JayHoaxH8r MU - 1/5 21:52:36
     I read the title and knew immediately it was a scam. (nm) - Newcatbirdseat MU - 1/5 21:34:59
          how is it a scam? says the # of anchor babies exceeds the - blake1771 MU - 1/5 21:38:01
               that's what the title suggests but not what the text says - gmmm98 MU - 1/6 06:17:55
          Not a scam - meatiger MU - 1/5 21:35:54
               Right, so it's a scam. (nm) - Newcatbirdseat MU - 1/5 21:37:28
     What a misleading article - meatiger MU - 1/5 21:31:24
          It's Breitbart...and it has a certain audience - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/5 23:58:13
          The headline can be misleading, but if a new state was - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:36:39
               OK (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/6 10:08:03
               That is a retarded statement - meatiger MU - 1/5 21:39:54
                    Reword it if you like. The # of anchor babies born in the US - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:47:48
                         Of course Texas & California are probably among the states - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:02:38
                         RE: Reword it if you like. The # of anchor babies born in the US - meatiger MU - 1/5 22:01:10
                              OK. About 372,000 anchor babies born in the US in 2019. - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:12:41
                                   And that means absolutely nothing - meatiger MU - 1/5 22:16:36
                                        It gives a little scope as to the size of the # of anchor - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:40:31
                                             falling birth rates are the reason countries have - ashtray UF - 1/6 10:14:15
                                             States mean nothing - meatiger MU - 1/5 22:50:49
                                                  'at least 4.5 million anchor babies in the US < 18-years-old - JeffB MU - 1/5 23:15:11
     U.S. birth rate below replacement level... - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:31:10
          Wut? - TigerMatt STL - 1/5 22:13:53
               RE: Wut? - see below... - JeffB MU - 1/5 22:15:55
          lol at the last sentence (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/5 21:47:31
               Why? - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:52:58
                    What are the first two words? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/5 21:54:39
                         OK, their bad. They should have left off 'every year'. (nm) - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:59:24
                              Why? - Grasslands MU - 1/6 06:44:50
                                   They should have left off 'EVERY YEAR'. Replacement level - JeffB MU - 1/6 08:59:59
                         OMG, we're not having enough twins and - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/5 21:59:03
          Arabic names have moved into the top 10 baby names in US - JeffB MU - 1/5 21:32:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard