Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

That was the reasoning the WB apparently went

Posted on: October 6, 2019 at 10:17:02 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
to Congress. They filed a complaint with the CIA, didn't like how they were handling it, so then they reported it to Congress, and then to the ICIG.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Multiple - Ace AU - 10/6 08:31:11
     lol the first one didn't quite work out like they thought - Sal MU - 10/6 08:57:05
     IT'S HAPPENING!! - tigerdb MU - 10/6 08:48:24
     but did he fill out the ig's internal form correctly? - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 08:34:37
          Its a moving target(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/6 08:57:42
          Are you excusing it? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 08:57:23
               we've done that dance already - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 09:00:46
                    It would have been a very easy box to check - Sal MU - 10/6 09:01:49
                         The "check the box" doesn't ask whether a WB has spoken with - tigerdb MU - 10/6 09:46:48
                              Yes, it is checking a box - Sal MU - 10/6 09:56:15
                                   LMAO, first it was "the form was changed", now it's this bs. - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:14:13
                                        That was the reasoning the WB apparently went - Sal MU - 10/6 10:17:02
                                             Here you go: "criminal referral" from trump's appointee - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:23:16
                                                  The phone call to the DOJ was two days after - Sal MU - 10/6 10:29:19
                                                       "through a college" = wb didn't report it to trump - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:35:25
                                                            That is still reporting it - Sal MU - 10/6 10:36:45
                                             LOL...you need better sources(nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:20:15
                                                  That was in the NYT's article (nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 10:20:56
                                                       No - that's your ASSumption(nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:40:11
                                                            RE: No - that's your ASSumption(nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 10:48:37
          He being Schiff, right?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/6 08:48:19
               probably don jr. - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 08:58:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard