Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It would have been a very easy box to check

Posted on: October 6, 2019 at 09:01:49 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and just tell the ICIG who else they had contacted. It wasn't some sort of administrative error.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Multiple - Ace AU - 10/6 08:31:11
     lol the first one didn't quite work out like they thought - Sal MU - 10/6 08:57:05
     IT'S HAPPENING!! - tigerdb MU - 10/6 08:48:24
     but did he fill out the ig's internal form correctly? - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 08:34:37
          Its a moving target(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/6 08:57:42
          Are you excusing it? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 08:57:23
               we've done that dance already - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 09:00:46
                    It would have been a very easy box to check - Sal MU - 10/6 09:01:49
                         The "check the box" doesn't ask whether a WB has spoken with - tigerdb MU - 10/6 09:46:48
                              Yes, it is checking a box - Sal MU - 10/6 09:56:15
                                   LMAO, first it was "the form was changed", now it's this bs. - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:14:13
                                        That was the reasoning the WB apparently went - Sal MU - 10/6 10:17:02
                                             Here you go: "criminal referral" from trump's appointee - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:23:16
                                                  The phone call to the DOJ was two days after - Sal MU - 10/6 10:29:19
                                                       "through a college" = wb didn't report it to trump - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:35:25
                                                            That is still reporting it - Sal MU - 10/6 10:36:45
                                             LOL...you need better sources(nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:20:15
                                                  That was in the NYT's article (nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 10:20:56
                                                       No - that's your ASSumption(nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:40:11
                                                            RE: No - that's your ASSumption(nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 10:48:37
          He being Schiff, right?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/6 08:48:19
               probably don jr. - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 08:58:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard