Welcome Guest

LMAO, first it was "the form was changed", now it's this bs.

Posted on: October 6, 2019 at 10:14:13 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Having a discussion with a congressional staffer OR discussing with personal counsel is not a "FORMAL REPORTING" (read the instructions instead of the form.)

There is NO INDICATION that the WB "also filed a formal complaint" with CIA counsel (TRUMP APPOINTEE.) CIA counsel became aware of it through 3rd party contact (again "NOT REPORTING"), and was alarmed by trump's actions.

There is no criminal act here - if the wb mischecked a box, the only potential ramification is loss of WB status (like he/she is going to have that anyway.) I'm sure that trump/rudy already know who the wb is.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Multiple - Ace AU - 10/6 08:31:11
     IT'S HAPPENING!! - tigerdb MU - 10/6 08:48:24
     but did he fill out the ig's internal form correctly? - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 08:34:37
          Its a moving target(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/6 08:57:42
          Are you excusing it? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 08:57:23
               we've done that dance already - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 09:00:46
                    It would have been a very easy box to check - Sal MU - 10/6 09:01:49
                         The "check the box" doesn't ask whether a WB has spoken with - tigerdb MU - 10/6 09:46:48
                              Yes, it is checking a box - Sal MU - 10/6 09:56:15
                                   LMAO, first it was "the form was changed", now it's this bs. - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:14:13
                                        That was the reasoning the WB apparently went - Sal MU - 10/6 10:17:02
                                             Here you go: "criminal referral" from trump's appointee - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:23:16
                                                  The phone call to the DOJ was two days after - Sal MU - 10/6 10:29:19
                                                       "through a college" = wb didn't report it to trump - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:35:25
                                                            That is still reporting it - Sal MU - 10/6 10:36:45
                                             LOL...you need better sources(nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:20:15
                                                  That was in the NYT's article (nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 10:20:56
                                                       No - that's your ASSumption(nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/6 10:40:11
                                                            RE: No - that's your ASSumption(nm) - Sal MU - 10/6 10:48:37
          He being Schiff, right?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/6 08:48:19
               probably don jr. - gmmm98 MU - 10/6 08:58:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard