Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Arguing about decisions 70 years ago most certainly is.

Posted on: August 7, 2019 at 13:46:58 CT
Chievous'Bandaid MU
Posts:
4269
Member For:
18.77 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
nm
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Churchill on the bombing of Dresden - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 11:34:14
     RE: Churchill on the bombing of Dresden - redngray MU - 8/7 13:40:57
     Second guessing something that happened 70 years ago? - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 8/7 12:55:24
          It’s not second guessing (nm) - pickle MU - 8/7 13:32:39
               Arguing about decisions 70 years ago most certainly is. - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 8/7 13:46:58
                    It isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 8/7 13:51:43
     Why Churchill personally approved the Dresden strike: - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:02:38
          That was the pretext for a terror bombing as Churchill - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 12:10:19
               You should change your handle to Billy Pilgrim - Ferg STL - 8/7 12:24:27
                    Hey! A literary post - pickle MU - 8/7 12:38:47
               No - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:11:12
                    When faced with facts - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 8/7 12:15:31
                         Yep... He fails to understand that Churchill stated - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:19:28
                              No I understand it completely. You have your head up your - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 12:25:30
                                   No. It was a military target that became - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:55:22
                                        Yeah because it was decided to use that as a pretext - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 13:38:08
                                             Try again. - Spanky KU - 8/7 13:45:37
     Hindsight is 20/20 on all things... - Gyro MU - 8/7 11:48:22




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard