Welcome Guest

No I understand it completely. You have your head up your

Posted on: August 7, 2019 at 12:25:30 CT

Emmanuel Goldstein

Posts:

1701

Member For:

6.65 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

ass as usual.

It was a terror bombing campaign under the pretext of a military target. Yes it had Eastern Front communications importance, but it was also a refugee city which was considered a major bonus. That is why it was bombed excessively.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Churchill on the bombing of Dresden - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 11:34:14

RE: Churchill on the bombing of Dresden - redngray MU - 8/7 13:40:57

Second guessing something that happened 70 years ago? - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 8/7 12:55:24

It’s not second guessing (nm) - pickle MU

- 8/7 13:32:39

Arguing about decisions 70 years ago most certainly is. - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 8/7 13:46:58

It isn’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 8/7 13:51:43

Why Churchill personally approved the Dresden strike: - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:02:38

That was the pretext for a terror bombing as Churchill - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 12:10:19

You should change your handle to Billy Pilgrim - Ferg STL - 8/7 12:24:27

Hey! A literary post - pickle MU

- 8/7 12:38:47

No - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:11:12

When faced with facts - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 8/7 12:15:31

Yep... He fails to understand that Churchill stated - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:19:28

No I understand it completely. You have your head up your - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 12:25:30

No. It was a military target that became - Spanky KU - 8/7 12:55:22

Yeah because it was decided to use that as a pretext - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/7 13:38:08

Try again. - Spanky KU - 8/7 13:45:37

Hindsight is 20/20 on all things... - Gyro MU - 8/7 11:48:22