Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Well as a preacher one would expect him to see things

Posted on: September 4, 2018 at 12:48:49 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51160
Member For:
16.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
through a biblical lens. The points he made were based on Constitution principles not theological though.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

What would you think about having only moderates - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 12:05:49
     Lol. Moderates are what liberals pretend to be. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/4 13:05:01
          Such as ?:(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 13:21:35
     none of the current SC judges nor cavanaugh - justwinbaby KC - 9/4 12:56:12
          So prior case decisions shed no light? - paleojas MU - 9/4 13:06:09
     What about judges that upheld the constitution? - Emoji Man MSU - 9/4 12:55:22
          that would be conservative. - justwinbaby KC - 9/4 12:57:00
     Ok genius how would that work exactly - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 12:48:05
          Isn’t that what what happens now?(nm) - recruiter MU - 9/4 12:50:37
          Like it did with Earl Warren(nm) - Mormad MU - 9/4 12:49:11
     RE: What would you think about having only moderates - MOCO SON MU - 9/4 12:19:08
          Lol, no. - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 13:01:42
          You are incorrect sir, unless there has been a major shift - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 12:26:06
               Thanks for laying out argument against strong centralized - TigerMatt STL - 9/4 12:29:46
                    As in most things, a balance works best(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 12:35:12
                         only what you call balance - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 12:43:39
                              No(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 13:00:23
                                   Incorrect - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 13:33:23
          liberals have been caught - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 12:22:32
     far too late - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 12:14:20
          It started with Scalia and Thomas. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 13:02:06
               No it didn't (nm) - pickle MU - 9/4 13:41:41
               incorrect - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 13:31:43
          You didn't answer the question. Try not to knee jerk it(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 12:27:11
               incorrect. You're projecting. - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 12:28:31
                    Do you know the confirmation vote on the 3 you listed? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 13:03:49
                         yes, Republicans tend to follow the law - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 13:31:05
     Or crazy idea, only have Constitutionalist serve on the SC. - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/4 12:12:43
          The constitution was written purposely vague - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 12:53:29
               No it wasn't (nm) - pickle MU - 9/4 13:38:32
               lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/4 13:34:38
          Oh boy - and you got past this first line: - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 12:41:41
               Well as a preacher one would expect him to see things - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/4 12:48:49
          Exactly. That is what superficials like the raskol and - hokie VT - 9/4 12:31:30
               When I hear SC Justices talk about precedence it drives me - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/4 12:44:47
                    I agree. Mostly. Certainly decisions that were made an error - hokie VT - 9/4 13:25:29
               yes, and the process designed to change laws - FootballRefugee MU - 9/4 12:40:45




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard