 |
|
Spending lavishly is not 'evidence' of tax fraud for a
Posted on: August 1, 2018 at 13:56:14 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146272
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
wealthy person.
The defense does not have to explain it away as the judge refused to admit his wealth as evidence.
The prosecution has to PROVE he committed tax fraud. It should be easy:
1) Produce evidence of how much income he earned from US and foreign sources in the tax years in question.
2) Produce his tax returns for the tax years in question.
3) Reconcile the difference.
Edited by Spanky at 13:56:46 on 08/01/18
The defense does not have to explain it away as the judge refused to admit his wealth as evidence.
The prosecution has to PROVE he committed tax fraud. It should be easy:
1) Produce evidence of how much income he earned from US and foreign sources in the tax years in question.
2) Produce his tax returns for the tax years in question.
3) Reconcile the difference.
Edited by Spanky at 13:56:46 on 08/01/18
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Spending lavishly is not 'evidence' of tax fraud for a - Spanky KU - 8/1 13:56:14