Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I guess the judges just couldn't see past partisanship

Posted on: July 23, 2018 at 13:13:58 CT
MrBlueSky MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
20.49 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
When arriving at a conclusion different than yours. I guess you'll never see eye to eye with them either.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

i'll say this again, but if you think the affidavit on Page - blake1771 KC - 7/23 12:48:10
     means to an end; partisanship over integrity (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:18:45
     I'll offfer a serious post, - justwinbaby KC - 7/23 13:18:38
          without question (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:19:03
     I guess the judges just couldn't see past partisanship - MrBlueSky MU - 7/23 13:13:58
     The simple fact is the FBI didn't do it's - Sal KC - 7/23 13:03:01
          But according to Rask a majority of the dossier HAS been - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/23 13:14:47
          and applied for a warrant 18 months later... - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:11:50
               that is NOT legal justification to label a US citizen an - blake1771 KC - 7/23 15:39:19
               RE: and applied for a warrant 18 months later... - None**** MU - 7/23 14:28:39
          lol - lqf2b8 MU - 7/23 13:05:52
               hell yes (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:06:39
          Local mall cop tells FBI how to do their job, story at 6:00(nm) - TheShoe STL - 7/23 13:04:44
               Damn. Attack the poster instead of arguing the point(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/23 14:33:41
               stunning ad hom in place of an argument. good work, Reddit - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:19:57
               someone should. FBI agents are apparently that retarded(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 7/23 13:13:43
               Odd response (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:05:15
     RE: i'll say this again, but if you think the affidavit on Page - None**** MU - 7/23 13:02:44
     There was about 200 pages of redacted **** on Page - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 12:57:52
          lol holy sh*t you liberals are dumb as hell - Sal KC - 7/23 12:58:39
     The Alex Jones Dossier. HAHA. nm - justwinbaby KC - 7/23 12:55:06
     4 judges that actually know the applicable laws - TheShoe STL - 7/23 12:54:45
          you're still hiding behind the "judge reviews the data" - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:21:52
          REPUBLICAN JUDGES AT THAT!!!!(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:02:59
          Tainted and withheld information was the basis of the - Spanky KU - 7/23 12:58:27
               The reason so many get approved is because - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 13:01:29
                    Or... - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:04:51
                         Yeah, I bet these judges do not even read what they are - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 13:13:58
                              Still think it was Section 702? - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:15:16
                    **** the 4th amendment(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:03:39
                         Talk to the Republicans who approved the process less than - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 13:06:21
                              so now you're arguing against the whole process as - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:24:20
                              Do you know that Section 702 pertains to? - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:10:03
                              **** them. - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:08:10
                              Most posters were against the GOP signing off on that crap (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:07:14
                                   Section 702 is a ruse.. it does not pertain to US citizens - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:10:54
               lol - lqf2b8 MU - 7/23 13:00:46
                    My bad.. 0.035% - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:03:58
          lol - lqf2b8 MU - 7/23 12:58:24
          Judges don't verify information presented to them (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 12:55:22
               LOL...Did the 4 gop judges READ the warrant applications? - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:02:28
                    maybe the can't read because they're REPUBLICANS!!!!!! - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:04:56
                         them dang rinos!!(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:07:41
                              he's mocking you, dope (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:22:45
                                   and I'm mocking him, stupid teetee. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:27:23
                                        No, you're embarrassing yourself (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 14:17:11
                              if you weren't such a partisan hack, you would understand - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:09:07
                    No, he's alleging the FISA application was misleading - Sal KC - 7/23 13:04:33
                         LMAO - no, that's not what he's saying at all. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:07:05
                              db - he means if the FBI had verified it rather than - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:25:20
                                   teetee - is your IQ above 50? - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:28:48
               the point, i think, is that - gmmm98 MU - 7/23 13:00:59
                    It's hilarious... - mizzoumurfkc MU - 7/23 14:15:17
               this retard is never going to grasp that. nm - justwinbaby KC - 7/23 12:56:20
                    Nor can he grasp this fact: Over the entire 33-year period, - Spanky KU - 7/23 12:59:22
                         It'd be interesting to see what the basis - Sal KC - 7/23 13:00:46
                              probably DEMOCRAT judges(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:06:07
                    apparently no liberal can (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 12:57:04
                         You ****wits are alleging the entire government is against - TheShoe STL - 7/23 13:03:08
                              no, he isn't (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:26:47
                              No I'm not (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:04:50
               judges dont like to be shown up either(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU - 7/23 12:56:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard