Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The reason so many get approved is because

Posted on: July 23, 2018 at 13:01:29 CT
KenMan33 MU
Posts:
2771
Member For:
19.12 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the fbi took extreme steps to ensure the warrant was in good order and valid before submitting. If Republicans did not like how many FISA applications are approved why did the majority of them approve of the renewal of the process less than a year ago?

This article tells you the FBI vetting process.

https://www.justsecurity.org/38422/aint-easy-fisa-warrant-fbi-agent/
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

i'll say this again, but if you think the affidavit on Page - blake1771 KC - 7/23 12:48:10
     means to an end; partisanship over integrity (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:18:45
     I'll offfer a serious post, - justwinbaby KC - 7/23 13:18:38
          without question (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:19:03
     I guess the judges just couldn't see past partisanship - MrBlueSky MU - 7/23 13:13:58
     The simple fact is the FBI didn't do it's - Sal KC - 7/23 13:03:01
          But according to Rask a majority of the dossier HAS been - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/23 13:14:47
          and applied for a warrant 18 months later... - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:11:50
               that is NOT legal justification to label a US citizen an - blake1771 KC - 7/23 15:39:19
               RE: and applied for a warrant 18 months later... - None**** MU - 7/23 14:28:39
          lol - lqf2b8 MU - 7/23 13:05:52
               hell yes (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:06:39
          Local mall cop tells FBI how to do their job, story at 6:00(nm) - TheShoe STL - 7/23 13:04:44
               Damn. Attack the poster instead of arguing the point(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/23 14:33:41
               stunning ad hom in place of an argument. good work, Reddit - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:19:57
               someone should. FBI agents are apparently that retarded(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 7/23 13:13:43
               Odd response (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:05:15
     RE: i'll say this again, but if you think the affidavit on Page - None**** MU - 7/23 13:02:44
     There was about 200 pages of redacted **** on Page - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 12:57:52
          lol holy sh*t you liberals are dumb as hell - Sal KC - 7/23 12:58:39
     The Alex Jones Dossier. HAHA. nm - justwinbaby KC - 7/23 12:55:06
     4 judges that actually know the applicable laws - TheShoe STL - 7/23 12:54:45
          you're still hiding behind the "judge reviews the data" - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:21:52
          REPUBLICAN JUDGES AT THAT!!!!(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:02:59
          Tainted and withheld information was the basis of the - Spanky KU - 7/23 12:58:27
               The reason so many get approved is because - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 13:01:29
                    Or... - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:04:51
                         Yeah, I bet these judges do not even read what they are - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 13:13:58
                              Still think it was Section 702? - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:15:16
                    **** the 4th amendment(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:03:39
                         Talk to the Republicans who approved the process less than - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 13:06:21
                              so now you're arguing against the whole process as - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:24:20
                              Do you know that Section 702 pertains to? - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:10:03
                              **** them. - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:08:10
                              Most posters were against the GOP signing off on that crap (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:07:14
                                   Section 702 is a ruse.. it does not pertain to US citizens - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:10:54
               lol - lqf2b8 MU - 7/23 13:00:46
                    My bad.. 0.035% - Spanky KU - 7/23 13:03:58
          lol - lqf2b8 MU - 7/23 12:58:24
          Judges don't verify information presented to them (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 12:55:22
               LOL...Did the 4 gop judges READ the warrant applications? - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:02:28
                    maybe the can't read because they're REPUBLICANS!!!!!! - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:04:56
                         them dang rinos!!(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:07:41
                              he's mocking you, dope (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:22:45
                                   and I'm mocking him, stupid teetee. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:27:23
                                        No, you're embarrassing yourself (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 14:17:11
                              if you weren't such a partisan hack, you would understand - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:09:07
                    No, he's alleging the FISA application was misleading - Sal KC - 7/23 13:04:33
                         LMAO - no, that's not what he's saying at all. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:07:05
                              db - he means if the FBI had verified it rather than - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:25:20
                                   teetee - is your IQ above 50? - tigerdb MU - 7/23 13:28:48
               the point, i think, is that - gmmm98 MU - 7/23 13:00:59
                    It's hilarious... - mizzoumurfkc MU - 7/23 14:15:17
               this retard is never going to grasp that. nm - justwinbaby KC - 7/23 12:56:20
                    Nor can he grasp this fact: Over the entire 33-year period, - Spanky KU - 7/23 12:59:22
                         It'd be interesting to see what the basis - Sal KC - 7/23 13:00:46
                              probably DEMOCRAT judges(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/23 13:06:07
                    apparently no liberal can (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 12:57:04
                         You ****wits are alleging the entire government is against - TheShoe STL - 7/23 13:03:08
                              no, he isn't (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 13:26:47
                              No I'm not (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 13:04:50
               judges dont like to be shown up either(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU - 7/23 12:56:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard