Welcome Guest

A misinterpretation of policy. Or perhaps the policy did not

Posted on: June 4, 2018 at 21:43:57 CT

TigerMatt STL

Posts:

96450

Member For:

26.44 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

specify an exception to law enforcement and needs clarifying of intent.

Going to the media was a crybaby move.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

What the Supreme Court Got Wrong in Its Gay-Wedding Cake - ummmm MU - 6/4 20:50:19

LOSER! - DoltfromSTL MU - 6/4 20:56:02

thanks for your gift - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:07:54

You didn't read it. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/4 20:57:32

No, it looked like much bloviating without a point... - DoltfromSTL MU - 6/4 21:02:00

it's actually a good read and makes an important point that - blake1771 KC - 6/4 21:03:48

The Colorado Civil Rights Commission would bend over back- - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:07:28

If you read the article, you would know that the author - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:03:47

I did. Individual business owners have property rights - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:01:35

i provided you with that - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:08:37

I was reading the article. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:10:24

With someone who could explain it to you? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:12:19

This is the problem with pickletonians - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:15:27

You don't understand the article to render an assessment - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:18:48

You blew by his explanation which adequately explained - MizzouTigerz MU

- 6/4 21:51:24

Did the Supreme Court ruling recognize the business owner - TigerMatt STL - 6/4 21:54:09

He did simply say that. It's not a tome, it's about a 16 - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:04:51

Yes. A private business owner should not be forced to - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:09:13

Why did you add the "religious views" qualifier? - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:10:08

Because that was the reason the baker had. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:11:21

You previously expanded it to all business owners, so I was - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:14:22

Oh, business owners can refuse business to anyone they want. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:18:21

you finally get the concept, while attempting sarcasm. - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:20:07

It may not be a good business decision, but the question for - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:19:55

Do you REALLY think Whatburger CORPORATE was happy with - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:26:48

You're as useful in a discussion as a box of rocks (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:11:58

RE: You're as useful in a discussion as a box of rocks (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:18:36

it doesn't have anything to do with his religious views - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:10:07

Yes it does. What was the baker's objection to baking - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:13:19

lmfao gods below you're truly an idiot. - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:18:12

Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:17:58

Sure. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:19:07

Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:20:54

RE: Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:28:34

Fair enough. I'll leave you alone on this issue then. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:29:55

Let's address Whataburger - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:35:05

RE: Let's address Whataburger - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:37:04

So what do you think was the reason for that low level - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:40:51

Maybe he didn't know the policy? Maybe he didn't believe - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:44:52

A misinterpretation of policy. Or perhaps the policy did not - TigerMatt STL - 6/4 21:43:57

Or a stupid employee. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 22:22:29

TL;DR version the yappers here will miss, dismiss, ignore - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 20:53:14