Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yes it does. What was the baker's objection to baking

Posted on: June 4, 2018 at 21:13:19 CT
Tigrrrr! MU
Posts:
262694
Member For:
23.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
their cake?


Ewwwwww, it's so gaaaaaay?


No, it conflicted with his religious beliefs.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

What the Supreme Court Got Wrong in Its Gay-Wedding Cake - ummmm MU - 6/4 20:50:19
     LOSER! - DoltfromSTL MU - 6/4 20:56:02
          thanks for your gift - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:07:54
          You didn't read it. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/4 20:57:32
               No, it looked like much bloviating without a point... - DoltfromSTL MU - 6/4 21:02:00
                    it's actually a good read and makes an important point that - blake1771 KC - 6/4 21:03:48
                         The Colorado Civil Rights Commission would bend over back- - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:07:28
                    If you read the article, you would know that the author - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:03:47
               I did. Individual business owners have property rights - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:01:35
                    i provided you with that - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:08:37
                         I was reading the article. - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:10:24
                              With someone who could explain it to you? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:12:19
                                   This is the problem with pickletonians - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:15:27
                                        You don't understand the article to render an assessment - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:18:48
                                             You blew by his explanation which adequately explained - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/4 21:51:24
                                                  Did the Supreme Court ruling recognize the business owner - TigerMatt STL - 6/4 21:54:09
                    He did simply say that. It's not a tome, it's about a 16 - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:04:51
                         Yes. A private business owner should not be forced to - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:09:13
                              Why did you add the "religious views" qualifier? - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:10:08
                                   Because that was the reason the baker had. - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:11:21
                                        You previously expanded it to all business owners, so I was - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:14:22
                                             Oh, business owners can refuse business to anyone they want. - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:18:21
                                                  you finally get the concept, while attempting sarcasm. - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:20:07
                                                  It may not be a good business decision, but the question for - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:19:55
                                                       Do you REALLY think Whatburger CORPORATE was happy with - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:26:48
                                        You're as useful in a discussion as a box of rocks (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:11:58
                                             RE: You're as useful in a discussion as a box of rocks (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:18:36
                              it doesn't have anything to do with his religious views - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:10:07
                                   Yes it does. What was the baker's objection to baking - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:13:19
                                        lmfao gods below you're truly an idiot. - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:18:12
                                        Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:17:58
                                             Sure. - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:19:07
                                                  Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:20:54
                                                       RE: Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:28:34
                                                            Fair enough. I'll leave you alone on this issue then. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:29:55
                                                                 Let's address Whataburger - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:35:05
                                                                      RE: Let's address Whataburger - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:37:04
                                                                           So what do you think was the reason for that low level - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 21:40:51
                                                                                Maybe he didn't know the policy? Maybe he didn't believe - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:44:52
                                                                                A misinterpretation of policy. Or perhaps the policy did not - TigerMatt STL - 6/4 21:43:57
                                                                                     Or a stupid employee. - Tigrrrr! MU - 6/4 22:22:29
     TL;DR version the yappers here will miss, dismiss, ignore - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 20:53:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard