Welcome Guest

If you read the article, you would know that the author

Posted on: June 4, 2018 at 21:03:47 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44856

Member For:

12.71 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

agrees with the SCOTUS result without agreeing with the reasons for arriving at the result.

So, then you would know why calling him a loser was wrong. Next time, read the article before you comment.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

What the Supreme Court Got Wrong in Its Gay-Wedding Cake - ummmm MU - 6/4 20:50:19

LOSER! - DoltfromSTL MU - 6/4 20:56:02

thanks for your gift - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:07:54

You didn't read it. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/4 20:57:32

No, it looked like much bloviating without a point... - DoltfromSTL MU - 6/4 21:02:00

it's actually a good read and makes an important point that - blake1771 KC - 6/4 21:03:48

The Colorado Civil Rights Commission would bend over back- - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:07:28

If you read the article, you would know that the author - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:03:47

I did. Individual business owners have property rights - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:01:35

i provided you with that - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:08:37

I was reading the article. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:10:24

With someone who could explain it to you? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:12:19

This is the problem with pickletonians - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:15:27

You don't understand the article to render an assessment - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:18:48

You blew by his explanation which adequately explained - MizzouTigerz MU

- 6/4 21:51:24

Did the Supreme Court ruling recognize the business owner - TigerMatt MU

- 6/4 21:54:09

He did simply say that. It's not a tome, it's about a 16 - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:04:51

Yes. A private business owner should not be forced to - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:09:13

Why did you add the "religious views" qualifier? - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:10:08

Because that was the reason the baker had. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:11:21

You previously expanded it to all business owners, so I was - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:14:22

Oh, business owners can refuse business to anyone they want. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:18:21

you finally get the concept, while attempting sarcasm. - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:20:07

It may not be a good business decision, but the question for - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:19:55

Do you REALLY think Whatburger CORPORATE was happy with - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:26:48

You're as useful in a discussion as a box of rocks (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:11:58

RE: You're as useful in a discussion as a box of rocks (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:18:36

it doesn't have anything to do with his religious views - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:10:07

Yes it does. What was the baker's objection to baking - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:13:19

lmfao gods below you're truly an idiot. - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 21:18:12

Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:17:58

Sure. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:19:07

Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:20:54

RE: Should a business owner be able to refuse service on the - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:28:34

Fair enough. I'll leave you alone on this issue then. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:29:55

Let's address Whataburger - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:35:05

RE: Let's address Whataburger - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:37:04

So what do you think was the reason for that low level - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 21:40:51

Maybe he didn't know the policy? Maybe he didn't believe - ummmm MU - 6/4 21:44:52

A misinterpretation of policy. Or perhaps the policy did not - TigerMatt MU

- 6/4 21:43:57

Or a stupid employee. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/4 22:22:29

TL;DR version the yappers here will miss, dismiss, ignore - 90Tiger MU - 6/4 20:53:14