Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

probably do less damage when out of DC, than when they're

Posted on: April 24, 2018 at 11:55:02 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
there. Ideally, they would go "back home" and listen to their constituents - in lieu of listening to the dc lobbyists.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

7 openings on 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - Spanky KU - 4/24 10:46:54
     Are you not confident his House and Senate majorities will - TigerJackSwartz MU - 4/24 11:12:33
          House? no - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:41:59
     What does the house have to do with it? - tigerdb MU - 4/24 11:11:48
          The public servants are in recess for half the summer? - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:13:11
               probably do less damage when out of DC, than when they're - tigerdb MU - 4/24 11:55:02
                    Maybe in schoolhouse rock they do that. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:58:29
                    yeah, that's what they do when not in DC - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:57:19
                         You're really struggling teetee - tigerdb MU - 4/24 12:04:20
                              yeah, that's what they will do when not in DC - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:06:27
     What do you mean? Don't these people just interpret - ummmm MU - 4/24 10:58:26
          I can't find the judicial review clause in the Constitution. - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:07:18
               You don't want to find it - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:21:58
                    RE: You don't want to find it - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:49:28
                    RE: You don't want to find it - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:34:13
                    Not even those who believe in judicial review will - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:34:02
                         It is an implied power - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:51:50
                              Federalist 78 was written by Alexander Hamilton who did - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:00:41
                                   RE: Federalist 78 was written by Alexander Hamilton who did - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:05:34
                                   BUT IT'S A LINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND HE'S AN AUTHORITY - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:05:03
                              and if it is an implied power, why did you quote the constit - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:53:02
                              RE: It is an implied power - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:52:29
                                   Was that question intended for me to answer? You posted - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:57:54
                                        lmfao "merely served to affirm" - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:04:29
                                             You ignored almost ALL of my post.. - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:15:37
                                                  Those professors should start with a plain reading of the - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:32:17
                                                  RE: You ignored almost ALL of my post.. - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:23:47
                                                       "In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:25:15
                                                            is that supposed to be where the power of judicial review - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:27:07
                                                  Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:20:48
                                                       RE: Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:25:55
                                                            RE: Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:27:18
                                                                 Read! - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:35:57
                                                                      and yet you still claim it is only "implied" and requires - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:41:40
                                                                      and still it didn't make it into the constitution (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:40:01
                                                                      And yet, it was not included in the actual Constitution - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:37:21
                                                                           The nation disagrees with you - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:51:16
                                                                                lol and there we have it!, the laydown, spanky style (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 13:01:55
                                                                                     No laydown... You are wrong and no-one agrees with you - Spanky KU - 4/24 13:23:08
                                                                                          ...or who endorses that law. - ummmm MU - 4/24 13:31:24
                                                                                          You in this thread: - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 13:31:19
                                                                                          you've rather embarrassingly made the point (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 13:29:03
                                                                                argumentum ad populum (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 12:54:05
                                                                                No way. The benefactors of the power grab disagree with - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:53:37
                         If it is in the constitution, what was the importance of M v - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:34:50
                              Home run trot? (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:45:55
                                   just waiting for Spanky, the constitutional scholar to - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:49:51
                              That case also shows the political hackery of the court - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:39:34
                    cases - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:33:59
               It's right below the clause that authorizes the President - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:10:18
                    Oh yeah, by the Exceptions to the 2nd Amendment clause.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:35:13
          Not those that are appointed by Democrats - Spanky KU - 4/24 10:59:09
               Hmm... I thought judges just followed the law. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:09:21
               LOL - mizzoumurfkc MU - 4/24 11:03:57
               Lol like John Roberts? The Obamacare deciding vote.(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 4/24 11:02:02
                    why was roberts' vote "the deciding" vote - didn't the other - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:07:03
                         It's as if he didn't think before posting that - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:08:26
                    What makes Roberts the deciding vote? - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:04:59
                         I guess he wasn’t the deciding vote - El-ahrairah BAMA - 4/24 12:28:13
                         Maybe not the deciding vote, but he did write the majority - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:08:47
                              So not the deciding vote. Got it - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:22:33
                                   As I just indicated, yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:36:20
     Chuck schemer permitted the sec of state to be confirmed. He - hokie VT - 4/24 10:52:28
          He will curse Dirty Harry for invoking the Nuclear Option - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:04:02




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard