Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
I can't find the judicial review clause in the Constitution.
Posted on: April 24, 2018 at 11:07:18 CT
TigerMatt
MISS
Posts:
85458
Member For:
25.23 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Maybe someone can help me out?
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
7 openings on 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 10:46:54
Are you not confident his House and Senate majorities will
-
TigerJackSwartz
MU
-
4/24 11:12:33
House? no
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:41:59
What does the house have to do with it?
-
tigerdb
MU
-
4/24 11:11:48
The public servants are in recess for half the summer?
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:13:11
probably do less damage when out of DC, than when they're
-
tigerdb
MU
-
4/24 11:55:02
Maybe in schoolhouse rock they do that. (nm)
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:58:29
yeah, that's what they do when not in DC
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:57:19
You're really struggling teetee
-
tigerdb
MU
-
4/24 12:04:20
yeah, that's what they will do when not in DC
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:06:27
What do you mean? Don't these people just interpret
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 10:58:26
I can't find the judicial review clause in the Constitution.
-
TigerMatt
MU
-
4/24 11:07:18
You don't want to find it
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:21:58
RE: You don't want to find it
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:49:28
RE: You don't want to find it
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:34:13
Not even those who believe in judicial review will
-
TigerMatt
MU
-
4/24 11:34:02
It is an implied power
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:51:50
Federalist 78 was written by Alexander Hamilton who did
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 12:00:41
RE: Federalist 78 was written by Alexander Hamilton who did
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:05:34
BUT IT'S A LINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND HE'S AN AUTHORITY
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:05:03
and if it is an implied power, why did you quote the constit
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:53:02
RE: It is an implied power
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:52:29
Was that question intended for me to answer? You posted
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:57:54
lmfao "merely served to affirm"
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:04:29
You ignored almost ALL of my post..
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 12:15:37
Those professors should start with a plain reading of the
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 12:32:17
RE: You ignored almost ALL of my post..
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:23:47
"In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 12:25:15
is that supposed to be where the power of judicial review
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:27:07
Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:20:48
RE: Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 12:25:55
RE: Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:27:18
Read!
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 12:35:57
and yet you still claim it is only "implied" and requires
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:41:40
and still it didn't make it into the constitution (nm)
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 12:40:01
And yet, it was not included in the actual Constitution
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 12:37:21
The nation disagrees with you
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 12:51:16
lol and there we have it!, the laydown, spanky style (nm)
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 13:01:55
No laydown... You are wrong and no-one agrees with you
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 13:23:08
...or who endorses that law.
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 13:31:24
You in this thread:
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 13:31:19
you've rather embarrassingly made the point (nm)
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 13:29:03
argumentum ad populum (nm)
-
TigerMatt
MU
-
4/24 12:54:05
No way. The benefactors of the power grab disagree with
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 12:53:37
If it is in the constitution, what was the importance of M v
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:34:50
Home run trot? (nm)
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:45:55
just waiting for Spanky, the constitutional scholar to
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:49:51
That case also shows the political hackery of the court
-
TigerMatt
MU
-
4/24 11:39:34
cases
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:33:59
It's right below the clause that authorizes the President
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:10:18
Oh yeah, by the Exceptions to the 2nd Amendment clause.(nm)
-
TigerMatt
MU
-
4/24 11:35:13
Not those that are appointed by Democrats
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 10:59:09
Hmm... I thought judges just followed the law. (nm)
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:09:21
LOL
-
mizzoumurfkc
MU
-
4/24 11:03:57
Lol like John Roberts? The Obamacare deciding vote.(nm)
-
El-ahrairah
BAMA
-
4/24 11:02:02
why was roberts' vote "the deciding" vote - didn't the other
-
90Tiger
MU
-
4/24 11:07:03
It's as if he didn't think before posting that
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:08:26
What makes Roberts the deciding vote?
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:04:59
I guess he wasn’t the deciding vote
-
El-ahrairah
BAMA
-
4/24 12:28:13
Maybe not the deciding vote, but he did write the majority
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:08:47
So not the deciding vote. Got it
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:22:33
As I just indicated, yes. (nm)
-
ummmm
MU
-
4/24 11:36:20
Chuck schemer permitted the sec of state to be confirmed. He
-
hokie
VT
-
4/24 10:52:28
He will curse Dirty Harry for invoking the Nuclear Option
-
Spanky
KU
-
4/24 11:04:02