Welcome Guest

What do you mean? Don't these people just interpret

Posted on: April 24, 2018 at 10:58:26 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44902

Member For:

13.46 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

the objective meaning of the Constitution and other federal and state law?

Does it matter which sage and robed folks sit on that Court?

Edited by ummmm at 10:58:47 on 04/24/18

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

7 openings on 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - Spanky KU - 4/24 10:46:54

Are you not confident his House and Senate majorities will - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 4/24 11:12:33

House? no - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:41:59

What does the house have to do with it? - tigerdb MU - 4/24 11:11:48

The public servants are in recess for half the summer? - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:13:11

probably do less damage when out of DC, than when they're - tigerdb MU - 4/24 11:55:02

Maybe in schoolhouse rock they do that. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:58:29

yeah, that's what they do when not in DC - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:57:19

You're really struggling teetee - tigerdb MU - 4/24 12:04:20

yeah, that's what they will do when not in DC - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:06:27

What do you mean? Don't these people just interpret - ummmm MU - 4/24 10:58:26

I can't find the judicial review clause in the Constitution. - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:07:18

You don't want to find it - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:21:58

RE: You don't want to find it - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:49:28

RE: You don't want to find it - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:34:13

Not even those who believe in judicial review will - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:34:02

It is an implied power - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:51:50

Federalist 78 was written by Alexander Hamilton who did - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:00:41

RE: Federalist 78 was written by Alexander Hamilton who did - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:05:34

BUT IT'S A LINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND HE'S AN AUTHORITY - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:05:03

and if it is an implied power, why did you quote the constit - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:53:02

RE: It is an implied power - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:52:29

Was that question intended for me to answer? You posted - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:57:54

lmfao "merely served to affirm" - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:04:29

You ignored almost ALL of my post.. - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:15:37

Those professors should start with a plain reading of the - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:32:17

RE: You ignored almost ALL of my post.. - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:23:47

"In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:25:15

is that supposed to be where the power of judicial review - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:27:07

Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:20:48

RE: Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:25:55

RE: Because John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash aren't - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:27:18

Read! - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:35:57

and yet you still claim it is only "implied" and requires - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:41:40

and still it didn't make it into the constitution (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 12:40:01

And yet, it was not included in the actual Constitution - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:37:21

The nation disagrees with you - Spanky KU - 4/24 12:51:16

lol and there we have it!, the laydown, spanky style (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 13:01:55

No laydown... You are wrong and no-one agrees with you - Spanky KU - 4/24 13:23:08

...or who endorses that law. - ummmm MU - 4/24 13:31:24

You in this thread: - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 13:31:19

you've rather embarrassingly made the point (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 13:29:03

argumentum ad populum (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 12:54:05

No way. The benefactors of the power grab disagree with - ummmm MU - 4/24 12:53:37

If it is in the constitution, what was the importance of M v - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:34:50

Home run trot? (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:45:55

just waiting for Spanky, the constitutional scholar to - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:49:51

That case also shows the political hackery of the court - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:39:34

cases - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:33:59

It's right below the clause that authorizes the President - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:10:18

Oh yeah, by the Exceptions to the 2nd Amendment clause.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/24 11:35:13

Not those that are appointed by Democrats - Spanky KU - 4/24 10:59:09

Hmm... I thought judges just followed the law. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:09:21

LOL - mizzoumurfkc MU

- 4/24 11:03:57

Lol like John Roberts? The Obamacare deciding vote.(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 4/24 11:02:02

why was roberts' vote "the deciding" vote - didn't the other - 90Tiger MU - 4/24 11:07:03

It's as if he didn't think before posting that - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:08:26

What makes Roberts the deciding vote? - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:04:59

I guess he wasn’t the deciding vote - El-ahrairah BAMA - 4/24 12:28:13

Maybe not the deciding vote, but he did write the majority - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:08:47

So not the deciding vote. Got it - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:22:33

As I just indicated, yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/24 11:36:20

Chuck schemer permitted the sec of state to be confirmed. He - hokie VT - 4/24 10:52:28

He will curse Dirty Harry for invoking the Nuclear Option - Spanky KU - 4/24 11:04:02