 |
|
As noted in his intro, they are proofs in the commonly
Posted on: January 11, 2018 at 21:41:43 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72858
Member For:
21.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
used sense of high probability... high enough that most people would consider them as sufficient "proof" for almost anything... not in the scientifically measurable sense of proof, however.
Taken together they give a very high sense of probability, make sense and are consistent with logic and reason.
The alternative, on the other hand, that "there is no God" would be very low probability, does not make sense, nor is it consistent with logic and reason.
Taken together they give a very high sense of probability, make sense and are consistent with logic and reason.
The alternative, on the other hand, that "there is no God" would be very low probability, does not make sense, nor is it consistent with logic and reason.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
As noted in his intro, they are proofs in the commonly - JeffB MU - 1/11 21:41:43