Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The ambiguity is removed by looking at other clauses

Posted on: April 18, 2017 at 11:42:07 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146275
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
in the document. Clauses where the Framers intended to limit had the limitations expressed.

Congress has the power to control migration of any class per that clause (because it does not limit to a class of people). The only limit placed on Congress was WHEN they gain that power.. not the class of people.

Is an Indentured Servant 'imported'? Is a Chinese railroad worker 'imported'?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

VA has 9M beneficiaries, 14,000 full-time physicians - Silas MU - 4/18 08:30:48
     Eliminate the VA 'healthcare' system and replace it - Spanky KU - 4/18 08:46:50
          I noticed you came back late yesterday to indicate - ummmm MU - 4/18 09:21:51
               It had been answered long, long before you chimed in - Spanky KU - 4/18 09:30:56
                    RE: It had been answered long, long before you chimed in - ummmm MU - 4/18 09:36:55
                         'whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to - Spanky KU - 4/18 09:47:18
                              None of those specify slaves. - ummmm MU - 4/18 09:50:02
                                   It only counts "Free Persons" and then defines what is - Spanky KU - 4/18 09:53:50
                                        It doesn't define slave at all (nm) - pickle MU - 4/18 10:22:51
                                             It defines what is 'not free' - Spanky KU - 4/18 10:25:42
                                                  It does not specify what a slave is. Remember, you used the - ummmm MU - 4/18 11:19:55
                                                       It removed all doubt as to what was covered by that clause - Spanky KU - 4/18 11:26:50
                                                            You forgot the word "Importation" which is highly indicative - ummmm MU - 4/18 11:29:39
                                                                 The ambiguity is removed by looking at other clauses - Spanky KU - 4/18 11:42:07
                                                                      This post further proves it is ambiguous. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/18 12:17:18
          Eliminate the VA healthcare system. (nm) - pickle MU - 4/18 08:47:38
               Nope - Spanky KU - 4/18 08:52:20
                    Yes. - pickle MU - 4/18 09:08:45
     Do you have a job--or just roam the intenet - mu7176grad MU - 4/18 08:34:39




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard