Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You post was ignorant. That is not how legal documents work

Posted on: April 17, 2017 at 10:31:12 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
142195
Member For:
20.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The actual words, not the perceived intent of a clause carries the day.

Please show where the power to regulate migration was limited to slaves in Article I, Section 9, Clause 1?

While you are at that, please explain to the Court, why the writers of the Constitution meant to limit Congressional control of immigration ONLY to slaves but failed to do so...especially in light of the fact that in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 they took the time to specify the slave population.

Why would they be specific in one place in the Constitution, but not the other????

Edited by Spanky at 10:32:43 on 04/17/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Constitution: immigration. Class in session - pickle MU - 4/17 08:42:06
     The Immigration Act of 1924 was a great law..... - MUTGR MU - 4/17 10:43:40
          It's unconstitutional, and therefore not law (nm) - pickle MU - 4/17 10:51:57
               RE: It's unconstitutional, and therefore not law (nm) - MUTGR MU - 4/17 10:53:52
                    It was never the law of the land - pickle MU - 4/17 10:56:12
                         RE: It was never the law of the land - MUTGR MU - 4/17 11:24:42
     this isn't class. this is OCD and copy/paste. There isn't - 90Tiger MU - 4/17 09:31:00
          I destroyed his premise below.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/17 09:35:22
               No. You didn't destroy anything, GAT (nm) - pickle MU - 4/17 09:41:35
                    Yes, he did.(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 4/17 09:52:00
     Are you a law professor? - Silas MU - 4/17 09:24:20
          Appeal to... (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/17 09:29:39
               credibility? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/17 09:31:26
     Oh now you are a constitutional lawyer(nm) - MizSecZou MU - 4/17 09:12:51
          ....authority. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/17 09:29:48
               If a person claims to have insight into a scientific - 90Tiger MU - 4/17 09:32:12
                    That's not what happened here. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/17 09:33:48
                         Sure it is (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/17 10:01:34
                              Also, it is not science. - ummmm MU - 4/17 10:09:01
                              No, they didn't question his knowledge on the topic. - ummmm MU - 4/17 10:04:41
                              That's not what happened here. - pickle MU - 4/17 10:04:21
     How does someone become a naturalized citizen - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/17 09:09:48
          It is in the Constitution - pickle MU - 4/17 09:15:42
               what stops that rule from including how they actually get - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/17 09:17:25
                    Because it's not a constitutional federal power - pickle MU - 4/17 09:20:47
                         didn't say it was, simply said immigration is a required 1st - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/17 09:22:44
                              No it isn't, and you didn't say that at all - pickle MU - 4/17 09:26:21
                                   unless congress sets a rule that says they must - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/17 09:30:12
                                        Huh? - pickle MU - 4/17 09:30:49
                                             if the rule congress makes regarding naturalization - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/17 09:36:07
                                                  Sure, that language is fine. - pickle MU - 4/17 09:40:24
                                                       btw, since you can't have you cake and eat it too - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/17 09:46:09
                                                            Huh? (nm) - pickle MU - 4/17 09:47:03
     Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 - Spanky KU - 4/17 09:05:01
          The Constitution: Art I, Sec. 9, Clause 1. Class in session - pickle MU - 4/17 09:13:15
               What does it SAY??? - Spanky KU - 4/17 09:34:39
                    It doesn't say that at all (nm) - pickle MU - 4/17 09:45:29
                         It certainly does. - Spanky KU - 4/17 09:48:53
                              I already did - pickle MU - 4/17 10:03:15
                                   There is NO LIMIT on the class of people to - Spanky KU - 4/17 10:18:17
                                        You didn't read my post - pickle MU - 4/17 10:24:50
                                             You post was ignorant. That is not how legal documents work - Spanky KU - 4/17 10:31:12
                                                  Contracts/compacts are all about breathing life into - ummmm MU - 4/17 10:33:25
                                                       Not really.. They are about clear language - Spanky KU - 4/17 10:37:32
                                                            Are you a contract law professor???????? (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/17 10:39:52
                                                                 No.. I deal with writing and enforcing contracts - Spanky KU - 4/17 11:28:46
                                                                      That's scary. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/17 12:26:09
                                                                           It would be if you were negotiating against me - Spanky KU - 4/17 14:38:48
                                                            It is about plain meaning, but when there is an ambiguity - ummmm MU - 4/17 10:39:26
                                                                 Agreed. The ambiguity portion is thrown out when one section - Spanky KU - 4/17 11:33:15
                                                                      All nice sounding contract principles. - ummmm MU - 4/17 12:25:37
     I'm going to make a donation to the US Autism & Asperger - Emoji Man MSU - 4/17 08:56:26
          RE: I'm going to make a donation to the US Autism & Asperger - Tigrrrr! MU - 4/17 09:02:38
               Hmmm. Very interesting. - Emoji Man MSU - 4/17 09:05:40
     You're saying that anything not mentioned - GA Tiger MU - 4/17 08:55:14
          No, that's not what I said - pickle MU - 4/17 09:02:29
               If an issue not in the constitution cannot be - GA Tiger MU - 4/17 09:34:12
                    if it is called out in the constitution - SwampTiger MU - 4/17 10:09:57
                    "cannot be discussed or decided" - pickle MU - 4/17 09:41:09
               Maybe a nice roller coaster ride would cheer you up. - Emoji Man MSU - 4/17 09:06:46
     Wrong board(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 4/17 08:47:10
          Not really. But apparently he didn't think enough people - MIZ45 MU - 4/17 08:48:11




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard