Its not remotely exact. For one thing, you

Posted on: March 13, 2017 at 12:59:13 CT

responded to almost nothing in my comments, except you don't want the fed gov't involved in HC, to include apparently vets. The vet issue alone is, as I say, an idiotic stance by any measure. But to expect all 50 states (if thats your option) to care for the people who do need help, and IMO deserve it, in an adequate manner is equally absurd, among other things. Though if you don't want feds in HC, why would you want the states in it either.

So in the interests of ideological purity you remain, on the issue, an idiot and an ass hole.

But what the hell, maybe the mentally ill and blind paraplegics in a wheel chair won't wander into traffic sometime in their life. Wouldn't want a traffic accident.

Edited by GA Tiger at 14:26:53 on 03/13/17