Welcome Guest

The answer is yes, but I'm not going back in time to

Posted on: November 28, 2016 at 20:49:44 CT

SparkyStalcup MU

Posts:

25259

Member For:

13.62 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

look for them. I have nothing to prove in that regard. I have better things to do than to provide free research to folks who will ignore it.

Edited by SparkyStalcup at 20:50:19 on 11/28/16

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Hey SparkyStalcup, what day did Obama close Gitmo? - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:12:33

Google it. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:19:18

Google says it is still open (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:20:17

Why are you trying to reason with a Rabid dog ? - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/28 20:23:12

I've had my rabies shots, already! - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:28:44

Question answered. Was that so hard? nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:22:49

Okay, but here's something I can't Google - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:24:02

Your question has a false premise. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:29:05

lol, a false premise you can't name? hilarious (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/28 21:47:05

It's very apparent, I shouldn't have to name it. There's - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 22:04:30

Do you have any links to posts you made complaining - JeffB MU

- 11/28 20:35:41

I have made some posts in the past. I was particularly - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:46:15

If you look at the video I linked to you will see that he - JeffB MU

- 11/28 20:57:28

I've never argued that Obama was a paragon of verity. - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:02:05

he was and remains a paragon of dishonesty (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/28 21:47:52

'Obama was (not) a paragon of verity.' Is a gross understate - JeffB MU

- 11/28 21:08:56

And yet, it would be a far more gross understatement to - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:15:18

He may turn out to be a worse liar than Clinton or Obama, - JeffB MU

- 11/28 21:24:27

He already is a much worse liar - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:44:51

So, the answer to JeffB's question is "no" (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:47:18

The answer is yes, but I'm not going back in time to - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:49:44

The question is "do you have any links" - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:52:18

The answer is yes, I have links, but I'm not - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:55:19

Sure you do. - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:59:24

Exactly. I'm not required to post evidence that will be - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:04:31

You're not required to do anything. - ummmm MU - 11/28 21:05:50

I don't really care what you think about that. I'm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:08:44

All you have to say is this: - ummmm MU - 11/28 21:13:13

Actually, I'll say it like this: - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:19:40

You almost had a non r v. d post, but you had to add that - ummmm MU - 11/28 21:26:49

The difference is not important whether it was a lie - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:50:45

Lol (nm) - pickle MU

- 11/29 06:13:34

That being? (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:33:30

How many premises does your question have? I - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:34:47

None. (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:35:52

I thought you were smarter than that. Try again, if you wish - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:42:29

My question has no premises. - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:43:27

Are you still beating your wife? It's a yes or no - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:47:53

That's not a premise. - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:50:33

OK, wise guy. It's a question BASED on a false - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 20:54:47

First of all, premises and assumptions are not the same - ummmm MU - 11/28 20:58:35

Read 1b. - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:03:42

That doesn't change anything. The dictionary isn't a logic - ummmm MU - 11/28 21:04:50

I'm done with you. And yes, I choose to ignore things - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 21:10:15

such a sorry sack you've become - ummmm undressed - 90Tiger MU - 11/28 21:50:40

I'm not surprised you believe that. nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/28 22:03:43

Done with me? - ummmm MU - 11/28 21:13:58