Welcome Guest

I would prefer voters alone decide. Oddly enough, one

Posted on: September 20, 2016 at 19:17:06 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
252398
Member For:
26.25 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
reason for the system initially was to keep small states from having an undue influence, population wise. Today, its the big states that seem to control what happens. I'm sure Founders never expected any state to have at least 60 times the population of another.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     It happened in 2000(nm) - El-ahrairah STL - 9/20 19:57:55
     Winner take all. - Diamond Dave MU - 9/20 19:49:24
          Or, the candidates could have a darts game. - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 19:46:25
               RE: Or, the candidates could have a darts game. - patriot MU - 9/20 20:07:38
                    I think its appropriate. Hence my post.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 20:41:09
     That is the current system. - ummmm MU - 9/20 19:08:00
          I meant, without saying specifically, that ALL states - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 19:12:24
               I gotcha. I misunderstood what you were saying. (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/20 19:13:01
     Ok - Mr. Orange SU - 9/20 19:04:49
     the founders didn't install a winner-take-all system (nm) - pickle MU - 9/20 19:04:14
     I think it should be by congressional district + 2 - dangertim MU - 9/20 18:56:13
     By Congressional District? Prorated by percent of vote? - Spanky KU - 9/20 18:54:40
          I would prefer voters alone decide. Oddly enough, one - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 19:17:06




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard