Welcome Guest

That is the current system.

Posted on: September 20, 2016 at 19:08:00 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
What you suggest is already in place.

The states decide how the electors will be apportioned. Nebraska and Maine currently split their electors, like you suggest.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     It happened in 2000(nm) - El-ahrairah STL - 9/20 19:57:55
     Winner take all. - Diamond Dave MU - 9/20 19:49:24
          Or, the candidates could have a darts game. - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 19:46:25
               RE: Or, the candidates could have a darts game. - patriot MU - 9/20 20:07:38
                    I think its appropriate. Hence my post.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 20:41:09
     That is the current system. - ummmm MU - 9/20 19:08:00
          I meant, without saying specifically, that ALL states - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 19:12:24
               I gotcha. I misunderstood what you were saying. (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/20 19:13:01
     Ok - Mr. Orange SU - 9/20 19:04:49
     the founders didn't install a winner-take-all system (nm) - pickle MU - 9/20 19:04:14
     I think it should be by congressional district + 2 - dangertim MU - 9/20 18:56:13
     By Congressional District? Prorated by percent of vote? - Spanky KU - 9/20 18:54:40
          I would prefer voters alone decide. Oddly enough, one - GA Tiger MU - 9/20 19:17:06




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard