Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You are conflating those two sentences.

Posted on: September 7, 2016 at 11:55:34 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72172
Member For:
21.41 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The age of consent is 16 means that anyone who is age 16 is deemed capable of deciding whether or not he or she is capable of engaging in sexual intercourse.

The 2nd sentence applies to victims over age 14 but under age 16.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

2nd amendment rights don't extend to shooting your 16 yr old - JeffB MU - 9/7 10:43:05
     Doubt a jury would convict - Spanky KU - 9/7 10:53:18
          I don't know. That might depend upon the circumstances. - JeffB MU - 9/7 11:15:49
               He actually was committing a crime - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:33:39
                    You're misunderstanding what that says (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/7 11:47:52
                         No.. I am not. - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:50:16
                              You clearly are (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/7 13:25:44
                    No, I think you are reading that incorrectly. You are citing - JeffB MU - 9/7 11:47:47
                         Perhaps.. but likely not. - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:49:50
                              You are conflating those two sentences. - JeffB MU - 9/7 11:55:34
                                   Perhaps.... - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:59:07
                                        Nor does it say 'older than 14 and less than 25' either... - JeffB MU - 9/7 12:10:06
                                             Look.. I am saying I am not sure. - Spanky KU - 9/7 12:20:11
                                                  OK, but I doubt a jury decision would answer the question. - JeffB MU - 9/7 12:29:42
          You thinking nullification? (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/7 11:02:53
               I am thinking dropped charges or acquittal - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:20:47
                    dropped charges aren't jury related (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/7 12:31:02
                    I would call it nullification - ummmm MU - 9/7 11:25:32
                         and you would be incorrect in doing so - FootballRefugee MU - 9/7 11:47:59
                         So "the People" actually decide guilt or innocence - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:27:30
                              What? (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/7 11:45:33
                                   I can see where you come up with a bit of an analogy, but - JeffB MU - 9/7 11:53:01
                                        I agree that nullification in this instance has nothing - ummmm MU - 9/7 13:25:30
                                   Who DECIDES if a law has been broken? - Spanky KU - 9/7 11:48:03
                                        It depends. (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/7 11:48:32
                                             What does Hillary have to do with this? (nm) - JeffB MU - 9/7 11:57:39
     Play stupid games, get stupid rewards(nm) - SEC_BIG_GAMEHUNTER MU - 9/7 10:44:48
          Are you talking about the mamma, the boyfriend or both? (nm) - JeffB MU - 9/7 11:16:35
               boyfriend(nm) - SEC_BIG_GAMEHUNTER MU - 9/7 11:42:50




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard