Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Nobody is disputing what the funding was earmarked for

Posted on: January 30, 2025 at 14:57:20 CT
Bosalphus KC
Posts:
8490
Member For:
8.8 months
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
3
they're trying to say the claim is false by pointing to items that have already been purchased and/or shipped. I have yet to see evidence that properly refutes the claim.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Great Condom Caper and the Theft of U.S. Tax Dollars - JeffB MU - 1/30 13:31:29
     None of the money sent to Gaza was spent on condoms - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 13:47:01
          The OMB didn't say that it was already sent, they said that - JeffB MU - 1/30 14:50:17
               RE: The OMB didn't say that it was already sent, they said that - sks MU - 1/30 15:17:12
                    No credible source has been able to refute - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 15:56:07
                         RE: No credible source has been able to refute - sks MU - 1/30 17:09:43
                              You’re the one claiming it was made up - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 20:10:44
          Facts don't matter to them, save your breath, they - playhard KC - 1/30 14:30:24
               Those "facts" from the AP article he posted - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:41:04
                    Where are the facts? - sks MU - 1/30 14:52:44
                         Anything out of trumps mouth they consider facts - playhard KC - 1/30 15:21:58
                              You didn't read any of it - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 15:55:32
                         Nobody is disputing what the funding was earmarked for - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:57:20
               steele dossier, russian collusion, biden laptop, covid lab, - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 14:38:23
          Incorrect (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:01:34
          Reuters' fact check has already been fact checked - Columbian Gold MU - 1/30 13:58:20
               NO, you lying sack of excrement nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:01:01
                    Well that really proves it. Thanks for that(nm) - AWOLTiger KC - 1/30 14:03:28
                         Well, there's no evidence of condom purchases nma - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:14:29
                              There's no evidence there were no condom purchase - Columbian Gold MU - 1/30 14:23:16
                                   Sure there is. Donald Trump said there were, which means - *M* KC - 1/30 14:45:24
                    Your post has been debunked by fact checkers, sorry - Columbian Gold MU - 1/30 14:01:44
                         Except this it hasn't, and you're still a lying sack! - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:06:29
                              Those fact checkers are talking about shipments that - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:11:45
                                   Do you think that point matters to screeching Sparkles? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 14:39:45
                                   Was it really money for condoms? What else was being bought - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/30 14:31:01
               RE: Reuters' fact check debunked: They, like most msm has no - BH O'bonga MU - 1/30 14:00:20
                    Lol at an anonymous person on Tigerboard who - *M* KC - 1/30 14:03:04
                    If you say anything, its likely false.nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:02:13
                         You have been caught lying multiple times - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:02:39
                              Remember all of the lies he believed in under biden? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 14:41:00
          'no evidence' means 'lazy reporters'(nm) - Spanky KU - 1/30 13:53:22
               And yet..... - sks MU - 1/30 14:00:29
                    How do you know there is no evidence inside the Trump Admin? - Spanky KU - 1/30 14:38:08
          Sigh - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/30 13:51:08
     it makes complete sense that you would want to - Seagull MU - 1/30 13:44:14
     condom bombs - Spanky KU - 1/30 13:43:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard