Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Those fact checkers are talking about shipments that

Posted on: January 30, 2025 at 14:11:45 CT
Bosalphus KC
Posts:
10640
Member For:
1.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
have already been shipped. This was specifically about funding being stopped before procurement could take place. So the fact checkers aren't fact checking the correct thing.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Great Condom Caper and the Theft of U.S. Tax Dollars - JeffB MU - 1/30 13:31:29
     None of the money sent to Gaza was spent on condoms - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 13:47:01
          The OMB didn't say that it was already sent, they said that - JeffB MU - 1/30 14:50:17
               RE: The OMB didn't say that it was already sent, they said that - sks MU - 1/30 15:17:12
                    No credible source has been able to refute - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 15:56:07
                         RE: No credible source has been able to refute - sks MU - 1/30 17:09:43
                              You’re the one claiming it was made up - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 20:10:44
          Facts don't matter to them, save your breath, they - playhard KC - 1/30 14:30:24
               Those "facts" from the AP article he posted - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:41:04
                    Where are the facts? - sks MU - 1/30 14:52:44
                         Anything out of trumps mouth they consider facts - playhard KC - 1/30 15:21:58
                              You didn't read any of it - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 15:55:32
                         Nobody is disputing what the funding was earmarked for - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:57:20
               steele dossier, russian collusion, biden laptop, covid lab, - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 14:38:23
          Incorrect (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:01:34
          Reuters' fact check has already been fact checked - Columbian Gold MU - 1/30 13:58:20
               NO, you lying sack of excrement nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:01:01
                    Well that really proves it. Thanks for that(nm) - AWOLTiger KC - 1/30 14:03:28
                         Well, there's no evidence of condom purchases nma - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:14:29
                              There's no evidence there were no condom purchase - Columbian Gold MU - 1/30 14:23:16
                                   Sure there is. Donald Trump said there were, which means - *M* KC - 1/30 14:45:24
                    Your post has been debunked by fact checkers, sorry - Columbian Gold MU - 1/30 14:01:44
                         Except this it hasn't, and you're still a lying sack! - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:06:29
                              Those fact checkers are talking about shipments that - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:11:45
                                   Do you think that point matters to screeching Sparkles? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 14:39:45
                                   Was it really money for condoms? What else was being bought - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/30 14:31:01
               RE: Reuters' fact check debunked: They, like most msm has no - BH O'bonga MU - 1/30 14:00:20
                    Lol at an anonymous person on Tigerboard who - *M* KC - 1/30 14:03:04
                    If you say anything, its likely false.nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/30 14:02:13
                         You have been caught lying multiple times - Bosalphus KC - 1/30 14:02:39
                              Remember all of the lies he believed in under biden? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 14:41:00
          'no evidence' means 'lazy reporters'(nm) - Spanky KU - 1/30 13:53:22
               And yet..... - sks MU - 1/30 14:00:29
                    How do you know there is no evidence inside the Trump Admin? - Spanky KU - 1/30 14:38:08
          Sigh - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/30 13:51:08
     it makes complete sense that you would want to - Seagull MU - 1/30 13:44:14
     condom bombs - Spanky KU - 1/30 13:43:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard